PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

who can we beat?

Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

who can we beat?

Postby Pony_Fan » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:33 am

Rice, ECU, South Miss?

Rice at home hopefully we can win. I only see maybe 2-3 wins in conf.

I hope Dia is ok, we really need him.
User avatar
Pony_Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6130
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Tx, USA

Postby George S. Patton » Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:43 am

10 wins this year, if we're lucky. We're just going to have to ride this out.
George S. Patton
 

Postby mr. pony » Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:40 pm

we're good at that! :lol:
mr. pony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm

Postby Pony81 » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:25 pm

If we continue to lose key players to injury - Roberts, Dia et al then I can see us not winning any conference games.

Doherty should be embarrased that the team he assembled is so young and inexperienced. He should be wise enough to leven this group with some JUCO talent so that they can have a chance at winning.

Doherty must have thought these guys would have jelled by now into at least a competitive team.

For SMU to be this bad is ridiculous.
Pony 81
Pony81
Heisman
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 10:09 pm

Postby perunapower » Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:52 pm

Pony81 wrote:If we continue to lose key players to injury - Roberts, Dia et al then I can see us not winning any conference games.

Doherty should be embarrased that the team he assembled is so young and inexperienced. He should be wise enough to leven this group with some JUCO talent so that they can have a chance at winning.

Doherty must have thought these guys would have jelled by now into at least a competitive team.

For SMU to be this bad is ridiculous.


Chill out Chicken Little. Roberts is back (and was for the last two games) and Dia will be back next week.

Oh yeah, and we are competitive, but perhaps you didn't pay attention to the last two games.
User avatar
perunapower
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2501
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:39 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby papawasamustang » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:23 am

What team are you watching?

Since the SFA defeat, we have lost to UTEP by 13, UofH by 28 & Tulane by 15.
Included in that mix is the loss 1 point loss to Tulsa.

They have also lost to USC Upstate, Southern, Alabama State & Centenary.

You can speculate all you want or you can look at the facts.
papawasamustang
Heisman
 
Posts: 1740
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:57 pm

Postby perunapower » Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:38 am

papawasamustang wrote:What team are you watching?

Since the SFA defeat, we have lost to UTEP by 13, UofH by 28 & Tulane by 15.
Included in that mix is the loss 1 point loss to Tulsa.

They have also lost to USC Upstate, Southern, Alabama State & Centenary.

You can speculate all you want or you can look at the facts.


I said TWO games. Meaning the Tulsa game and the Tulane game, which was competitive for a good chunk of the game.
User avatar
perunapower
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2501
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:39 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Postby Hoop Fan » Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:00 am

so now its ok just being partially competitive with Tulane? If you saw the Houston game at Moody, you know how far away we really are at the moment from competing against decent college basketball teams. Its all about your frame of reference. Yes, we have some freshmen playing. But you still have to see things like being able to guard people, keeping up with the speed of the game, and offensive execution. The things you can chalk up to freshman mistakes are losing close games, taking bad shots under pressure etc. You can't just dismiss everything and accept 30 point home losses in which we never competed. We werent playing North Carolina.
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Postby mathman » Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:28 am

Hoop Fan wrote:so now its ok just being partially competitive with Tulane? If you saw the Houston game at Moody, you know how far away we really are at the moment from competing against decent college basketball teams. Its all about your frame of reference. Yes, we have some freshmen playing. But you still have to see things like being able to guard people, keeping up with the speed of the game, and offensive execution. The things you can chalk up to freshman mistakes are losing close games, taking bad shots under pressure etc. You can't just dismiss everything and accept 30 point home losses in which we never competed. We werent playing North Carolina.

So who do you blame?
User avatar
mathman
Heisman
 
Posts: 1753
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:58 pm
Location: East Texas

Postby Hoop Fan » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:05 pm

Not looking to assign any blame. Never spent any time blaming or hating on this board. Plenty of other people do though, they're just not very consistent or balanced in their assessments.

This is not personal in any way, but I am not thrilled with this freshman class and what I see in it objectively. Yes, Papa looks like a possible difference maker, but even there i wonder how much upside there is, he is a prep school kid who was probably old for his class to begin with. Besides Papa, this class is no different in talent or readiness to play than the fairly typical SMU recruit over the years. Derrick Roberts, Stephen Woods, Dez Willingham, Kris Lowe, Dewayne Floyd. Guys like that, they all played alot in their first years here. (I wont even mention BHop, Sasser, Ross, Davis and Damon). Do you really see a different caliber player in this current class that will automatically raise SMU up from where it has commonly been? Harp and Walker are somehow different than those guys? Are they even equally as promising? Sorry, I don't think so. And the real concern is that several freshmen are solidly behind them on the depth charts right now, so what does that mean? Look, when you decide to hype a freshman class and ride it to a 20+ loss season, with some real ugly losses, these are fair questions to ask yourself. Yes, we are young, but are we on track early on? Certainly worried from where I sit. You have to view it relative to something real, like other young players we have had here, or freshmen on other teams we are playing, but you can't just declare the season a success because the freshmen found their jockstraps, suit up and are able to run up and down the floor for 40 minutes. And yes, I want Doherty to succeed in a big way so spare me further questions on that.
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Postby mathman » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:16 pm

And to think all this time I thought you were blaming Doh. :roll:
User avatar
mathman
Heisman
 
Posts: 1753
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:58 pm
Location: East Texas

Postby Pony_Fan » Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:36 pm

I am a little disappointed at this point. I agree with HF that I don't see much upside aside from Dia. We need a high impact player to make things start moving. Problem is, we are stuck with most of these guys with schollies. Honestly, I am a bit concerned about his 5yr plan.

Off the court, Doh is amazing. I can guarantee he would have gotten Juco's if he could.

I am glad to hear the commercials and pub but it's a bit disconcerting when they aren't even competitive with most teams in conference. I think they have played enough games to be better than they are....we expected to be bad, I just didn't think this bad.
User avatar
Pony_Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6130
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Tx, USA

Postby George S. Patton » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:28 pm

SMU 69
UCF 67

In overtime. That's who we can beat.
George S. Patton
 

Postby PonyPride » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:35 pm

Without Papa Dia.
Without Mouhammad Faye.
Without Robert Nyakundi.



Speaking of Nyakundi, I watched him shoot a couple of hours before the game. I can't remember a guy in 20 years with his range. I have yet to see a guy with that kind of range. Flicking shots effortlessly from waaaay behind the line.
User avatar
PonyPride
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 22363
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas

Postby PonyDoh » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:38 pm

LOL @ people thinking a frosh averaging 11 & 7 isn't a difference maker in the future.. We have 2 other averaging 8 pts & 7 pts per, as well. IF you don't see a solid foundation being built, I don't know what to tell you.

We need some more quality ballers, but Rhodes/TK/ & Nyakundi, coupled with Dubois, Otis & the very underrated Justin Haynes, can be solid. Still need some more help, but its not that doom & gloom.Some young talent in the system. Clarke may have some skills, but I can't get a read on him.
“When I first committed to SMU, I thought it would take a couple of years of building. But with these players coming in, we should make a run. We have a lot of heavy hitters. It could get real ugly for a lot of teams we play.”- Jalen Jones
PonyDoh
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3066
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 2:58 pm

Next

Return to Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

 
cron