Main page conspiracy

by **expony18** » Tue Apr 15, 2008 1:03 pm

the picture of JJ on the front page has been altered...

i believe the sweatshirt JJ is wearing is Nike, with a small nike swoosh right above the letters smu... in fact i believe this picture has been posted before with the nike swoosh... addidas conspiracy

by **expony18** » Tue Apr 15, 2008 1:04 pm

i also might be completely wrong, but i'm pretty sure this photo has been altered...

by **smu diamond m** » Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:21 pm

We haven't been Nike since JJ has been here?

by **expony18** » Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:23 pm

smu diamond m wrote:We haven't been Nike since JJ has been here?

still wearing the old nike stuff... if you were at the spring game you would have noticed the players who came up to eat were wearing nike gear

by **smu diamond m** » Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:30 pm

I was at the spring game. I didn't make it to lunch.

by **PonyPride** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:25 pm

In the fall, football will join the other sports in adidas gear.

by **expony18** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:31 pm

this i know.. but why alter photos

by **ThadFilms** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:40 pm

expony18 wrote:this i know.. but why alter photos

The Government. The original photo also clearly shows an alien standing next to JJ.

by PK » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:24 pm

expony18 wrote:this i know.. but why alter photos

Why not? There are no free lunches.

by PK » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:25 pm

ThadFilms wrote:
expony18 wrote:this i know.. but why alter photos

The Government. The original photo also clearly shows an alien standing next to JJ.

I like your response better.

by **expony18** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:33 pm

PK wrote:
expony18 wrote:this i know.. but why alter photos
Why not? There are no free lunches.

so lunch on adidas?

by **smu diamond m** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:44 pm

expony18 wrote:
PK wrote:
expony18 wrote:this i know.. but why alter photos
Why not? There are no free lunches.
so lunch on adidas?

Certainly not on Nike

by PK » Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:05 pm

expony18 wrote:
PK wrote:
expony18 wrote:this i know.. but why alter photos
Why not? There are no free lunches.
so lunch on adidas?

i.e., why help Nike advertise? They don't do anything to support this site. As far as lunch on adidas, I don't see their logo anywhere so why should they pick up lunch?

by **PonyPride** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:26 pm

expony18 wrote:this i know.. but why alter photos

Same as before: no reason other than the fact that I'm still a beginner with PhotoShop, and I've been practicing by removing the logo of a company that no longer has a contractual relationship with SMU, just as I've done with some (but obviously not all) logos on helmets, jerseys, etc. Need to get some pictures of the coaches in adidas gear, huh? Sorry, that's pretty boring for your conspiracy theory, but it's all I can tell you.

by **expony18** » Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:18 am

no photoshop today!!!!!!!

Main page conspiracy

Main page conspiracy

Who is online