C-USA Replaces Big East in Texas Bowl

by **MustangIcon** » Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:20 pm

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/5844921.html

Not sure if anyone posted this already or not. What does this make the total C-USA bowl tie ins up to?

by **ThadFilms** » Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:24 pm

MustangIcon wrote:http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/5844921.html

Not sure if anyone posted this already or not. What does this make the total C-USA bowl tie ins up to?

79

by **that's great raplh** » Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:19 pm

i think is 10 fewer than that

by **smu diamond m** » Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:53 pm

by **ThadFilms** » Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:33 pm

smu diamond m wrote:6?

Dude, your math is WAAAAAY off, 6 is like 73 less than 79. Not 10. You big dummy.

by **MrMustang1965** » Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:42 pm

MustangIcon wrote:http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/5844921.html

Not sure if anyone posted this already or not. What does this make the total C-USA bowl tie ins up to?

Well, now we know where Texas Tech will be bowling this year.

by **CalallenStang** » Wed Jun 18, 2008 10:58 pm

MrMustang1965 wrote:
MustangIcon wrote:http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/5844921.html

Not sure if anyone posted this already or not. What does this make the total C-USA bowl tie ins up to?
Well, now we know where Texas Tech will be bowling this year.

The Dust Bowl? :lol:

If they ever put a bowl game in Lubbock or Oklahoma, they had better call it the Dust Bowl.

by **abezontar** » Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:28 pm

MustangIcon wrote:http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/5844921.html

Not sure if anyone posted this already or not. What does this make the total C-USA bowl tie ins up to?

Enough that it is beyond pathetic that we haven't made a single one in the modern bowl era.

by **mr. pony** » Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:21 am

I thought we already had a tie-in with the Texas Bowl.

by **CalallenStang** » Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:43 am

mr. pony wrote:I thought we already had a tie-in with the Texas Bowl.

It was only an every-other-year tie-in. The Big Least has now backed out of their tie-in, giving us an annual tie-in for the two years remaining on the current bowl contract.

by **SMU Football Blog** » Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:51 am

that gives us six EVERY year. Good. Whatever happened with those new bowls? Was there a chance for a tie-in there?

by **CalallenStang** » Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:54 am

SMU Football Blog wrote:that gives us six EVERY year. Good. Whatever happened with those new bowls? Was there a chance for a tie-in there?

We got a tie-in in St. Pete.

by **EastStang** » Thu Jun 19, 2008 4:13 pm

This is positive for a number of reasons. It means the organizers of the Texas Bowl think CUSA teams will do better at producing crowds than the BE and will produce decent ratings. It also means that the MWC did not poach. I'm happy to hear this news. Its good for CUSA which means its good for SMU. Remember, we get bowl money whether we go or not.

C-USA Replaces Big East in Texas Bowl

C-USA Replaces Big East in Texas Bowl

Re: C-USA Replaces Big East in Texas Bowl

Re: C-USA Replaces Big East in Texas Bowl

Re: C-USA Replaces Big East in Texas Bowl

Re: C-USA Replaces Big East in Texas Bowl

Who is online