DMN changes with SMU and college coverage

by **jtstang** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:43 am

SMU's a stepping stone job, PK, you know that.

by **BIGHORSE** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:49 am

Dr. Negative strikes again.

by PK » Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:54 am

jtstang wrote:SMU's a stepping stone job, PK, you know that.

I was just stating a sad fact in response to the other post...nothing more.

by **Nacho** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 9:02 am

I wonder how much longer the DMN can last. I feel like one their few remaning subscribers. I know I'm old school but I like reading a real paper newspaper. The newspapers did this to themselves by offering their content free on the internet.

by **jtstang** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 9:34 am

Nacho wrote:I wonder how much longer the DMN can last. I feel like one their few remaning subscribers. I know I'm old school but I like reading a real paper newspaper. The newspapers did this to themselves by offering their content free on the internet.

According the the prevailing wisdom on this site, they sealed their fate by failing to provide front page SMU sports coverage every single day, thus causing every reader in the metroplex to cancel.

BTW, I still read it every day in paper form.

by **jtstang** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 9:35 am

BIGHORSE wrote:Dr. Negative strikes again.

Please get a sense of humor, stoneface, please??

by **BIGHORSE** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:10 am

jtstang wrote:
BIGHORSE wrote:Dr. Negative strikes again.
Please get a sense of humor, stoneface, please??

I know you do not like reading labout the Mustangs in the paper, but

most of us loyal fans still like to see our team get coverage

even though "we dont deserve it".

by **couch 'em** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:28 am

Nacho wrote:The newspapers did this to themselves by offering their content free on the internet.

I just don't see how this can be true. NOBODY would pay for a subscription to a newspaper online. There is very little that appears in the DMN that doesn't appear in on a free, online-only news source.

by **jtstang** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:48 am

BIGHORSE wrote:
jtstang wrote:
BIGHORSE wrote:Dr. Negative strikes again.
Please get a sense of humor, stoneface, please??

I know you do not like reading labout the Mustangs in the paper, but

most of us loyal fans still like to see our team get coverage

even though "we dont deserve it".

Look, I'm not going to draw a picture for you. You either got the humor or you didn't, and clearly you didn't.

And I like to read every article about SMU, in paper form, unlike you and your non-subscribing buddies.

by **BIGHORSE** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:01 am

I am a longtime subscriber and read it every morning.

by **Cadillac** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:03 am

BIGHORSE wrote:I am a longtime subscriber and read it every morning.

Great, now you two ladies have something to read over morning tea.

-CoS

by **abezontar** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:07 am

Cadillac wrote:
BIGHORSE wrote:I am a longtime subscriber and read it every morning.

Great, now you two ladies have something to read over morning tea.

-CoS

I thought tea was an afternoon thing.

by **jtstang** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:38 am

Only if it is of the "long island iced" variety and Bighorse is buying.

by **George S. Patton** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:50 am

BTW, my people say while Bobbi is a solid reporter and asks the expected question, they cautioned me to not expect the story that goes in a much different direction.

They don't think she stinks, they just look at her as your standard reporter.

In terms of coverage, I think you can expect it to go down for UT and A&M with the personnel issues the DMN is facing.

by **smupony94** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:54 am

jtstang wrote:
BIGHORSE wrote:Dr. Negative strikes again.
Please get a sense of humor, stoneface, please??

I support you JT

DMN changes with SMU and college coverage

Who is online