|
College presidents want drinking age lowered to 18Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
25 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
College presidents want drinking age lowered to 18College presidents want drinking age lowered to 18
11:43 AM CDT on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 Associated Press College presidents from about 100 of the nation's best-known universities, including Duke, Dartmouth and Ohio State, are calling on lawmakers to consider lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18, saying current laws actually encourage dangerous binge drinking on campus. The movement called the Amethyst Initiative began quietly recruiting presidents more than a year ago to provoke national debate about the drinking age. "This is a law that is routinely evaded," said John McCardell, former president of Middlebury College in Vermont who started the organization. "It is a law that the people at whom it is directed believe is unjust and unfair and discriminatory." Other prominent schools in the group include Syracuse, Tufts, Colgate, Kenyon and Morehouse. But even before the presidents begin the public phase of their efforts, which may include publishing newspaper ads in the coming weeks, they are already facing sharp criticism. Mothers Against Drunk Driving says lowering the drinking age would lead to more fatal car crashes. It accuses the presidents of misrepresenting science and looking for an easy way out of an inconvenient problem. MADD officials are even urging parents to think carefully about the safety of colleges whose presidents have signed on. "It's very clear the 21-year-old drinking age will not be enforced at those campuses," said Laura Dean-Mooney, national president of MADD. Both sides agree alcohol abuse by college students is a huge problem. Research has found more than 40 percent of college students reported at least one symptom of alcohol abuse or dependance. One study has estimated more than 500,000 full-time students at four-year colleges suffer injuries each year related in some way to drinking, and about 1,700 die in such accidents. A recent Associated Press analysis of federal records found that 157 college-age people, 18 to 23, drank themselves to death from 1999 through 2005. Moana Jagasia, a Duke University sophomore from Singapore, where the drinking age is lower, said reducing the age in the U.S. could be helpful. "There isn't that much difference in maturity between 21 and 18," she said. "If the age is younger, you're getting exposed to it at a younger age, and you don't freak out when you get to campus." McCardell's group takes its name from ancient Greece, where the purple gemstone amethyst was widely believed to ward off drunkenness if used in drinking vessels and jewelry. He said college students will drink no matter what, but do so more dangerously when it's illegal. The statement the presidents have signed avoids calling explicitly for a younger drinking age. Rather, it seeks "an informed and dispassionate debate" over the issue and the federal highway law that made 21 the de facto national drinking age by denying money to any state that bucks the trend. But the statement makes clear the signers think the current law isn't working, citing a "culture of dangerous, clandestine binge-drinking," and noting that while adults under 21 can vote and enlist in the military, they "are told they are not mature enough to have a beer." Furthermore, "by choosing to use fake IDs, students make ethical compromises that erode respect for the law." "I'm not sure where the dialogue will lead, but it's an important topic to American families and it deserves a straightforward dialogue," said William Troutt, president of Rhodes College in Memphis, Tenn., who has signed the statement. But some other college administrators sharply disagree that lowering the drinking age would help. University of Miami President Donna Shalala, who served as secretary of health and human services under President Clinton, declined to sign. "I remember college campuses when we had 18-year-old drinking ages, and I honestly believe we've made some progress," Shalala said in a telephone interview. "To just shift it back down to the high schools makes no sense at all." McCardell claims that his experiences as a president and a parent, as well as a historian studying Prohibition, have persuaded him the drinking age isn't working. But critics say McCardell has badly misrepresented the research by suggesting that the decision to raise the drinking age from 18 to 21 may not have saved lives. In fact, MADD CEO Chuck Hurley said, nearly all peer-reviewed studies looking at the change showed raising the drinking age reduced drunk-driving deaths. A survey of research from the U.S. and other countries by the Centers for Disease Control and others reached the same conclusion. McCardell cites the work of Alexander Wagenaar, a University of Florida epidemiologist and expert on how changes in the drinking age affect safety. But Wagenaar himself sides with MADD in the debate. The college presidents "see a problem of drinking on college campuses, and they don't want to deal with it," Wagenaar said in a telephone interview. "It's really unfortunate, but the science is very clear." Another scholar who has extensively researched college binge-drinking also criticized the presidents' initiative. "I understand why colleges are doing it, because it splits their students, and they like to treat them all alike rather than having to card some of them. It's a nuisance to them," said Henry Wechsler of the Harvard School of Public Health. But, "I wish these college presidents sat around and tried to work out ways to deal with the problem on their campus rather than try to eliminate the problem by defining it out of existence," he said. Duke faced accusations of ignoring the heavy drinking that formed the backdrop of 2006 rape allegations against three lacrosse players. The rape allegations proved to be a hoax, but the alcohol-fueled party was never disputed. Duke senior Wey Ruepten said university officials should accept the reality that students are going to drink and give them the responsibility that comes with alcohol. "If you treat students like children, they're going to act like children," he said. Duke President Richard Brodhead declined an interview request. But he wrote in a statement on the Amethyst Initiative's Web site that the 21-year-old drinking age "pushes drinking into hiding, heightening its risks." It also prevents school officials "from addressing drinking with students as an issue of responsible choice." Hurley, of MADD, has a different take on the presidents.
Read a story online where a bar in College Park, MD was forced by other bars and neighbors around them to cancel $.25 beer night because they said it encouraged binge drinking.
You can come down on either side of the issue but the bottom line is that the Universities are tired of being sued when something happens to an underage drinker on campus and they think this will absolve them from a lot of the liability if the partaking of the alcohol is not by someone of an illegal age to do so. The argument has been going on for ages. The age was dropped to 18 while I was 16 or 17 and then raised back to 21 right before I turned 18. I always thought it was geared to keep me sober.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
I can vote.
I can go to war. I can enter into a binding contract. I can be the guardian of a minor. I can buy and carry a hand gun. BUT I CAN'T DRINK A BEER? Just send 'da money.
DiamondM75, is the drinking age 60 where you live?
I agree that this is largely about colleges wanting to remove the liability that comes with having 75% of your campus underage. Maybe someone that was around 'back then' can answer this for me: When the legal age was 18, would the same scenario play out, but just on a younger scale with high schoolers? I know many high school seniors are 18, so how does that work? What's stopping Jimmy and Johnny from popping in to the liquor store after school lets out? I guess parents can have more influence at that age (ie kids living at home), but it's something to think about. Sent from my Motorola brick.
That is so you do not get drunk, take your gun, shoot an alien's minor child, causing a binding contractual declaration of war with the alien nation. All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
I was a naive young teenager, but I do not think the 18 year age limit would interpret to the same effect with 16 and 17 year old kids in the manner that the 21 year limit translates to 18 year old kids. The 16 year olds do not have the same arguments as D75 mapped out, and they tend to have different priorities and do not run with the 19, 20, and 21 year olds like 18 year old college kids would. That said, the ages of those drinking today I believe are considerably lower than they were in my age group. Whether 18 or 21 limit, I think there are more 12 and ups drinking these days than in mine. All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
When I was a reporter, I covered a MADD conference in Houston. Afterwards, a LOT of the attendees were in the hotel bar slammin' 'em down. I asked one of the attendees if they were being a hypocrite. Their response: "We're not driving. We're staying at the hotel." True story.
At my high school in El Paso we had plenty of 19-21 year olds.
That slurping sound you hear in the background is jtstang and/or Stallion licking their lips anticipating all of the legal fees that they'll rack up defending such cases. ![]()
You have been on fire lately - keep it up
They are not anticipating more legal fees, they are salivating at the thought of 18 year old girls in the bars to prey on
and of course.......TWSS All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
25 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests |
|