|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
General discussion: anything you want to talk about!
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by J.T.supporta » Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:21 pm
smupony94 wrote:MrMustang1965 wrote:J.T.supporta wrote:With lower drinking age comes high penalties for DUI/DWI offenses
That slurping sound you hear in the background is jtstang and/or Stallion licking their lips anticipating all of the legal fees that they'll rack up defending such cases. ;)
They are not anticipating more legal fees, they are salivating at the thought of 18 year old girls in the bars to prey on
haha, so im guessing thats why you want them to drop the drinking age.
-

J.T.supporta

-
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
- Location: SMU
by couch 'em » Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:46 pm
mrydel wrote:SMUPhil wrote:DiamondM75, is the drinking age 60 where you live?
I agree that this is largely about colleges wanting to remove the liability that comes with having 75% of your campus underage.
Maybe someone that was around 'back then' can answer this for me: When the legal age was 18, would the same scenario play out, but just on a younger scale with high schoolers? I know many high school seniors are 18, so how does that work? What's stopping Jimmy and Johnny from popping in to the liquor store after school lets out? I guess parents can have more influence at that age (ie kids living at home), but it's something to think about.
I was a naive young teenager, but I do not think the 18 year age limit would interpret to the same effect with 16 and 17 year old kids in the manner that the 21 year limit translates to 18 year old kids. The 16 year olds do not have the same arguments as D75 mapped out, and they tend to have different priorities and do not run with the 19, 20, and 21 year olds like 18 year old college kids would. That said, the ages of those drinking today I believe are considerably lower than they were in my age group. Whether 18 or 21 limit, I think there are more 12 and ups drinking these days than in mine.
http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/youthissues/1085160584.html
When I was in high school most people just smoked pot or did other light drugs because it was much easier, cheaper to come by, and concealable than alcohol.
"I think Couchem is right." -EVERYONE
-

couch 'em

-
- Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
by mrydel » Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:57 pm
That chart surprises me a little but my main reference was to the younger age that kids drink. The 10, 11, 12 year olds. However, if you extend that chart back to the year I was 18, 283% would have consumed alcohol in the previous 30 days.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by smupony94 » Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:02 pm
J.T.supporta wrote:smupony94 wrote:MrMustang1965 wrote:J.T.supporta wrote:With lower drinking age comes high penalties for DUI/DWI offenses
That slurping sound you hear in the background is jtstang and/or Stallion licking their lips anticipating all of the legal fees that they'll rack up defending such cases. 
They are not anticipating more legal fees, they are salivating at the thought of 18 year old girls in the bars to prey on
haha, so im guessing thats why you want them to drop the drinking age.
Nah, I only date 19 and up. About half my age so it is less creepy.
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by Pony Soup » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:06 am
mrydel wrote:the bottom line is that the Universities are tired of being sued when something happens to an underage drinker on campus and they think this will absolve them from a lot of the liability if the partaking of the alcohol is not by someone of an illegal age to do so.
No question liability is on the mind of university lawyers, but safety is the main concern for many of those who run these schools and actually interact with students, particularly at smu. Regardless of the age, it is safer for students to drink legally, in public. I say change it.
It tastes better when served from a Bowl (game)!
-
Pony Soup

-
- Posts: 3471
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:35 pm
- Location: Austin, Tx
by smu diamond m » Sun Aug 24, 2008 2:08 pm
You have to be 21 to buy a handgun, and also 21 to be eligible for conceal and carry licensure. 18 is the age for long guns.
Sir, shooting-star, sir. Frosh 2005 (TEN YEARS AGO!?!) The original Heavy Metal.
-

smu diamond m

-
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: High on the Hilltop
-
by EastStang » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:56 am
The main idea was that 18 year olds are still in high school (for at least part of their senior year and there are 19 year olds as well). This means that they can go out and buy the beer and then give it to their underage friends. The death rate in the 70's after they lowered the drinking age and the speed limits continued to go up. After they lowered the drinking age there are still teenagers killed while driving but the percentages have gone down. The problem is of course that teenagers do not have the experience behind the will that older drivers have. Add a little alcohol and that is a recipe for disaster.
-
EastStang

-
- Posts: 12657
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am
by J.T.supporta » Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:15 pm
smu diamond m wrote:18 is the age for long guns.
TWSS
-

J.T.supporta

-
- Posts: 6160
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
- Location: SMU
by RednBlue11 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 4:36 pm
Turner will be THE last pres. to sign this
"There ain't nothing you can't solve with one more beer"
-

RednBlue11

-
- Posts: 4858
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:52 pm
- Location: Under the "X" in Texas
-
Return to Around the Hilltop
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests
|
|