|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by PK » Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:23 pm
jtstang wrote:chillinfool wrote:And of course, there's those who didn't know he even did that, and spoke with their head up their arse assuming he was just a thug.
Not really a thug, I just assumed there was a reason he was associating with a gay guy, and still kinda do.
Well...let's see. They went to some of the same classes? The stalker's brother use to be a football player at SMU and he liked to hang around football players? Since when does having someone stalk you means you are associating with that person? Interesting take on the situation.
SMU's first president, Robert S. Hyer, selected Harvard Crimson and Yale Blue as SMU's colors to symbolize SMU's high academic standards. We are one of the few Universities to have school colors with real meaning...and we just blow them off.
-

PK

-
- Posts: 8805
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas 75206
by Get_Some_Ponies » Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:24 pm
jtstang wrote:chillinfool wrote:And of course, there's those who didn't know he even did that, and spoke with their head up their arse assuming he was just a thug.
Not really a thug, I just assumed there was a reason he was associating with a gay guy, and still kinda do.
Could the reason be something like, he's not a bigot? Would that be reason enough to associate with a gay guy?
-
Get_Some_Ponies

-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:15 pm
- Location: New York
by jtstang » Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:28 pm
PK wrote:jtstang wrote:chillinfool wrote:And of course, there's those who didn't know he even did that, and spoke with their head up their arse assuming he was just a thug.
Not really a thug, I just assumed there was a reason he was associating with a gay guy, and still kinda do.
Well...let's see. They went to the same classes? The stalker's brother use to be a football player at SMU? Since when does having someone stalk you means you are associating with that person? Interesting take on the situation.
Get_Some_Ponies wrote:Could the reason be something like, he's not a bigot? Would that be reason enough to associate with a gay guy?
Both interesting theories. As plausible as the one I was thinking about.
And for the record, I associate with some gay men for the reason that I am friends with them. No shame in that. But I never had to punch any of them for hitting on me.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Get_Some_Ponies » Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:33 pm
jtstang wrote:PK wrote:jtstang wrote:chillinfool wrote:And of course, there's those who didn't know he even did that, and spoke with their head up their arse assuming he was just a thug.
Not really a thug, I just assumed there was a reason he was associating with a gay guy, and still kinda do.
Well...let's see. They went to the same classes? The stalker's brother use to be a football player at SMU? Since when does having someone stalk you means you are associating with that person? Interesting take on the situation.
Get_Some_Ponies wrote:Could the reason be something like, he's not a bigot? Would that be reason enough to associate with a gay guy?
Both interesting theories. As plausible as the one I was thinking about. And for the record, I associate with some gay men for the reason that I am friends with them. No shame in that. But I never had to punch any of them for hitting on me.
Well JWill is a pretty good looking guy. I can see where it could be a problem.
-
Get_Some_Ponies

-
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:15 pm
- Location: New York
by jtstang » Wed Aug 27, 2008 6:34 pm
So am I. Just ask me.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by SoCal_Pony » Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:09 pm
03Mustang wrote:I wasn't putting down JW's ability at QB...I wish he was still the starter. I was referring to his game as it translates to the NFL, which is probably worse than what Akili Smith was projected as.
To say 'probably worse' is quite an understatement.
Akili Smith was the 3rd person selected in the 1999 NFL Draft....No way, under any circumstances, could I ever see JW being even a 1st day draft pick.
-

SoCal_Pony

-
- Posts: 5901
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am
by 03Mustang » Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:27 pm
SoCal_Pony wrote:03Mustang wrote:I wasn't putting down JW's ability at QB...I wish he was still the starter. I was referring to his game as it translates to the NFL, which is probably worse than what Akili Smith was projected as.
To say 'probably worse' is quite an understatement. Akili Smith was the 3rd person selected in the 1999 NFL Draft....No way, under any circumstances, could I ever see JW being even a 1st day draft pick.
True...but in retrospect I bet the Bengals wish they had looked at Akili the same way
-
03Mustang

-
- Posts: 4238
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 12:47 am
- Location: Allen, TX
by ponyboy » Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:29 pm
J.T.supporta wrote:Stallion wrote:OK genius-he had 2 weeks splitting the time 5 ways. Brennan said he didn't understand the offense for a year. Willis is the best QB on the team right now-only you little Pollyannas who believe in the tooth-fairy don't understand what is going on.
I'm sorry but can you help me to understand what is going on
Me too. Please explain.
-
ponyboy

-
- Posts: 15134
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: University Park,TX US
by smupony94 » Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:58 pm
jtstang wrote:So am I. Just ask me.
God's honest truth - Thad agrees. Told me so at the Austin function for JJ.
Man crush no more
And I like throwing Thad under the bus to see if he is lurking
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by PK » Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:59 pm
jtstang wrote:PK wrote:jtstang wrote:chillinfool wrote:And of course, there's those who didn't know he even did that, and spoke with their head up their arse assuming he was just a thug.
Not really a thug, I just assumed there was a reason he was associating with a gay guy, and still kinda do.
Well...let's see. They went to the same classes? The stalker's brother use to be a football player at SMU? Since when does having someone stalk you means you are associating with that person? Interesting take on the situation.
Get_Some_Ponies wrote:Could the reason be something like, he's not a bigot? Would that be reason enough to associate with a gay guy?
Both interesting theories. As plausible as the one I was thinking about. And for the record, I associate with some gay men for the reason that I am friends with them. No shame in that. But I never had to punch any of them for hitting on me.
I have to assume you didn't have to punch anyone out for hitting on you because no one did. Yes, friendship is a good reason to associate with anyone, but would you still consider anyone a friend if they were stalking you?...female or male? Is there any question as to whether or not JW was being stalked? I thought that that had been well established by observations made by others.
SMU's first president, Robert S. Hyer, selected Harvard Crimson and Yale Blue as SMU's colors to symbolize SMU's high academic standards. We are one of the few Universities to have school colors with real meaning...and we just blow them off.
-

PK

-
- Posts: 8805
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas 75206
by jtstang » Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:39 am
PK, if only I was lucky enough to have female stalkers. Instead I got Thad.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests
|
|