I know you don't care but...

by **AirRaidTT6** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:10 pm

smupony94 wrote:
AirRaidTT6 wrote:TCU sucks.

She is a 10 in Lubbock

Funny, considering Tech is notorious for fine looking women.

by **The XtC** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:13 pm

[quote="AirRaidTT6"][quote="smupony94"][quote="AirRaidTT6"]TCU sucks.[/quote]

She is a 10 in Lubbock

[img]http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d49/smupony94/youcantaffordmeyx2.jpg[/img][/quote]

Funny, considering Tech is notorious for fine looking women.[/quote]

Really? Wow, you guys must go to great lengths to make sure they all remain well hidden when out of towners come to visit.

by **jtstang** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:15 pm

The XtC wrote:
AirRaidTT6 wrote:
smupony94 wrote:
AirRaidTT6 wrote:TCU sucks.

She is a 10 in Lubbock

Funny, considering Tech is notorious for fine looking women.

Really? Wow, you guys must go to great lengths to make sure they all remain well hidden when out of towners come to visit.

That's probably because you don't visit any barns when you're there.

by **AirRaidTT6** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:07 pm

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=188&f=1650&t=1050080

by **jtstang** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:10 pm

Point well taken.

by **Dutch** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:27 pm

AirRaidTT6 wrote:http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=188&f=1650&t=1050080

didn't see any of these alleged hotties. I guess we have a different standard of "hot".

by **mrydel** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:27 pm

I have a daughter that got her undergraduate degree at TT so I have to kind of side with AirRaidTT6 on this one. One of the girls on the posted site even kind of looks like her I am sad to say.

by **SmooBoy** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:30 pm

AirRaidTT6 wrote:http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=188&f=1650&t=1050080

That same picture has circulated for the past several years with no less than 30 schools photoshopping and claiming them as their own.

In reality, the girls are robots.

by **mrydel** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:31 pm

SmooBoy wrote:
AirRaidTT6 wrote:http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=188&f=1650&t=1050080

That same picture has circulated for the past several years with no less than 30 schools photoshopping and claiming them as their own.

In reality, the girls are robots.

You need to scroll down the entire thread. Ignore the claiming of the swim team.

by **AirRaidTT6** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:02 pm

Yeah the "swim team" claim was b.s.

by **PonyTime** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:30 pm

AirRaid6 - Great Response - I absolutely disagree with Dutch on this issue and must side with my friends from Texas Tech on this one. In fact - if the game gets out of hand the Fox Sports SW crew should just flash those pics on a rotating basis - their ratings are sure to go up.

by **J.T.supporta** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:36 pm

AirRaidTT6 wrote:http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=188&f=1650&t=1050080

whats the difference between a tech girl and a SMU girl?

you dont have to buy the tech girl a drink at the bar to sleep with her!!! :twisted:

by **couch 'em** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:17 pm

that swim pic is clearly photoshopped and is on every "real girlfriend" porno site on the web.

by **jkflamebo** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:34 pm

J.T.supporta wrote:
AirRaidTT6 wrote:http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=188&f=1650&t=1050080

whats the difference between a tech girl and a SMU girl?

you dont have to buy the tech girl a drink at the bar to sleep with her!!!

that's bloody brilliant, dont personally know if its true tho, but it might make sense lol

by **jtstang** » Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:43 pm

couch 'em wrote:that swim pic is clearly photoshopped and is on every "real girlfriend" porno site on the web.

That you know that is very impressive. I have only been to about 8% of them. But you are right as to those 378.

I know you don't care but...

Who is online