TCU(-24) at SMU

jkflamebo · Post by **jkflamebo** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:59 pm

according to the early lines. yikes. i think we can cover 24 pretty easily

Hoop Fan · Post by **Hoop Fan** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:15 pm

ugh, thats embarrasing. some rivals we are.

ALEX LIFESON · Post by **ALEX LIFESON** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:18 pm

I think the frogs defense, has only given up 24 points after three games. I believe their D is ranked #3 in the country.

03Mustang · Post by **03Mustang** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:25 pm

If we only got 7 against Tech's D, we'll be lucky to get 3 against TCU unless we really show up ready to play on offense.

I really hope we show up, but I'm done with any kind of expectations for this year.

HFvictory · Post by **HFvictory** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:39 pm

ALEX LIFESON wrote:I think the frogs defense, has only given up 24 points after three games. I believe their D is ranked #3 in the country.

TCU has given up 24, the D only 17 (one TD was on a blocked punt).

65Mustang · Post by **65Mustang** » Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:58 pm

03Mustang wrote:If we only got 7 against Tech's D, we'll be lucky to get 3 against TCU unless we really show up ready to play on offense.

I really hope we show up, but I'm done with any kind of expectations for this year.

and the 7 against Tech came in the last few secounds of the game and was a give away by a 3 and 4 string Tech roster.

And yes, I have known somebody from Tech smarter than a brick.

The XtC · Post by **The XtC** » Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:54 am

[quote="jkflamebo"]according to the early lines. yikes. i think we can cover 24 pretty easily[/quote]

You mean kind of like we did against Rice? Oh, wait............

BUS · Post by **BUS** » Mon Sep 15, 2008 7:25 am

X - stop using logic.

This is SMU football and you HAVE TO be positive.

See you Saturday.

smu diamond m · Post by **smu diamond m** » Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:32 pm

At least you PE fluffers aren't [deleted] about the uniform anymore -- OH WAIT

rooster · Post by **rooster** » Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:35 pm

jkflamebo wrote:according to the early lines. yikes. i think we can cover 24 pretty easily

Doubt it.

rooster · Post by **rooster** » Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:36 pm

Hoop Fan wrote:ugh, thats embarrasing. some rivals we are.

Unless something sparks in the mind of BLM in terms of his grasp of the offense, TCU will hang 40 on us easily.

Nacho · Post by **Nacho** » Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:38 pm

Some people never learn. You don't bet on SMU. Never. Losing money and watching SMU. No where but Texas.

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:44 pm

And no where but on this board do we have to put up with constant digs from someone who says he's a fan. You are a disgrace.

sail420s · Post by **sail420s** » Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:23 pm

03Mustang wrote:If we only got 7 against Tech's D, we'll be lucky to get 3 against TCU unless we really show up ready to play on offense.

I really hope we show up, but I'm done with any kind of expectations for this year.

We only got 7, but we had a bad OB call that should have been a TD and a dropped pass by AR that went thru his hands when he was two steps behind the D. I think BLM threw two int's inside the 30. All of the int's were not caused by pressure or good D (although 2 were good catches). They were all just bad throws. Barring those mistakes, we could have easily scored in the 20's. Our errors kept us to only 7, not TT.

TCU(-24) at SMU

TCU(-24) at SMU

Re: TCU(-24) at SMU

Re: TCU(-24) at SMU