How 'bout some love for wilkerson?????

by **ponygrad90** » Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:49 am

In my opinion its nice to see a third option step up on this offense. Ar and ES are proving they belong but then what? Finally Terrance Wilkerson becomes a legit third target.

But as i have said before even if JW was playing,

this offense is missing mapps bad!

We have the worst backfield imaginable at this point!

by **Stallion** » Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:10 am

I think he's got some potential but he's still learning the position which is natural for a young kid. For example on Thursday he short armed a possible TD in the endzone-the type of pass that Sanders has laid out on about 5 times this year and come out with the catch. I'm not sure if he really has great speed. But I believe his up-side potential is a lot higher than several guys that I'm scratching my head wondering what the heck they are doing starting various SMU games at the Division 1A level this year.

by **ponygrad90** » Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:16 am

Stallion-

I couldn't agree more about some of the palyers on the field?

Are we really that thin at receiver?

Why don't they put that Bradley Haynes back in?

at what point do you go back to devon Bailey over Rock???

Is there no room on the field for Burley anywhere?

by **RGV Pony** » Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:23 am

ponygrad90 wrote:

Is there no room on the field for Burley anywhere?

now that you mention it, I don't even remember seeing Burley on the sideline or on special teams

by **jkflamebo** » Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:27 am

if our receivers wouldnt drop any passes, we'd have a respectable wr corp that should include the three talked about plus haynes. no clue why he hasnt got any more playing time. i think our backfield is garbage with demyron, but becomes respectable with butler who should be the number one back in my opinion.

and yes put bailey in for rock

by **pony warrior** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:03 am

jkflamebo wrote:if our receivers wouldnt drop any passes, we'd have a respectable wr corp that should include the three talked about plus haynes. no clue why he hasnt got any more playing time. i think our backfield is garbage with demyron, but becomes respectable with butler who should be the number one back in my opinion.

and yes put bailey in for rock

Totally agree...

by **SMUguy** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:46 am

Not Bailey - Chris Banjo is the emerging talent at safety. At the moment, he's backing up Tyler Jones, and getting more and more playing time, but if he can learn the other safety spot, he should be starting with Jones. They've bee the best two safeties we have this year.

by **jkflamebo** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:02 pm

SMUguy wrote:Not Bailey - Chris Banjo is the emerging talent at safety. At the moment, he's backing up Tyler Jones, and getting more and more playing time, but if he can learn the other safety spot, he should be starting with Jones. They've bee the best two safeties we have this year.

what about bailey and banjo playing together? or do they play the same position?

by **giacfsp** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:07 pm

No, right now they are the second-team safeties - Banjo behind Jones, and Bailey behind Dennis. But I agreee with SMUguy's assertion that Banjo is the guy we need on the field. He's a guy who makes plays, and we need more of that.

by **SMU2007** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:30 pm

giacfsp wrote:No, right now they are the second-team safeties - Banjo behind Jones, and Bailey behind Dennis. But I agreee with SMUguy's assertion that Banjo is the guy we need on the field. He's a guy who makes plays, and we need more of that.

your avatar is just gross

by **SMU21TCU10** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:02 pm

I saw mario walker in on our drive right after tulane fumbled to start the 3rd.

by **SMU21TCU10** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 3:03 pm

I re-watched the game last night on tivo like a dork, thats why i noticed.

How 'bout some love for wilkerson?????

How 'bout some love for wilkerson?????

Who is online