|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by smupony94 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:48 pm
Just ahead of UNT
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by SmooBoy » Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:07 pm
smupony94 wrote:Just ahead of UNT
As it should be. We are getting to be partially competitive. They no longer have a pulse over in Denton.
-

SmooBoy

-
- Posts: 5820
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Trophy Club
by deepellumfrog » Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:00 pm
too true. while things are tough for the stangs, north texas state is truly a dead horse
-
deepellumfrog

-
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:07 pm
by ThadFilms » Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:22 pm
That is sad.
 Eric Dickerson in Pony Excess"I've love winning man, it's like better than losing." - Ebby Calvin "Nuke" LaLoosh
-

ThadFilms

-
- Posts: 6607
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Austin TX / Dallas TX / Hollywoodland CA
-
by smupony94 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:25 pm
ThadFilms wrote:That is sad.
Way to add something pertinent to this thread
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by Stallion » Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:54 pm
how could Army be below SMU after giving A&M all it could handle at Kyle Field and taking Tulane to the woodshead the weak after beating SMU?
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by jkflamebo » Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:57 pm
Stallion wrote:how could Army be below SMU after giving A&M all it could handle at Kyle Field and taking Tulane to the woodshead the weak after beating SMU?
all four teams mentioned above are garbage
-

jkflamebo

-
- Posts: 2089
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 8:20 pm
by PonySnob » Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:17 pm
June cometh!!!!!!!
-

PonySnob

-
- Posts: 11516
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by mrydel » Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:20 pm
Stallion wrote:how could Army be below SMU after giving A&M all it could handle at Kyle Field and taking Tulane to the woodshead the weak after beating SMU?
I think they take off points for being spread thin in Iraq and Afghanistan.
And of course, on defense we have used the Serge.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
by smupony94 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:24 pm
mrydel wrote:Stallion wrote:how could Army be below SMU after giving A&M all it could handle at Kyle Field and taking Tulane to the woodshead the weak after beating SMU?
I think they take off points for being spread thin in Iraq and Afghanistan. And of course, on defense we have used the Serge.
Been off your game a bit lately 
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by Lebanese4Life » Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:46 am
Where's Texas State on the list?
-
Lebanese4Life

-
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:58 am
- Location: Kuwait
by The XtC » Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:55 am
[quote="Lebanese4Life"]Where's Texas State on the list?[/quote]
The list only ranks D1-A or FBS teams, and Texas State is D1-AA, or FCS.
If you look at the Sagarin rankings, which include all D1 teams, SMU is currently #156, and Texas State is #196.
Try not to choke on the Kool-Aid.
-
The XtC

-
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 10:19 pm
by SMU_is_bowling » Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:32 am
ahh the rankings . . . how I love them!!! we deserve to be wherever we are ranked. While there have been flashes of improvement, until it turns into wins, 118 is right where we belong . . . maybe lower!
Sports, and all that implies.
-

SMU_is_bowling

-
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:34 am
- Location: Richardson, Tx
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: DiamondM75, Google [Bot] and 8 guests
|
|