mathman wrote:In the comments section below the article, the guy that wrote it felt the need to play the race card. He really is a very troubled individual.
False. A commenter made a reference to SMU students being "too scared of black people".
You can hate me all you want for writing this, but don't lie about me.
Gee, which stereotype does one want? Without want and attending school on Daddy's dime or without means and attending school via other financial avenues? Decisions, decisions.
Let's face it, we could bicker and argue over stereotypes, athletic records, academic records and so forth for days but the real measure of a school is how many porn stars* have come from that school.
I can't wait to see the research projects and results on that one.
*Playmates, Pets will serve as an adequate substitute.
ponyte wrote:Gee, which stereotype does one want? Without want and attending school on Daddy's dime or without means and attending school via other financial avenues? Decisions, decisions.
Let's face it, we could bicker and argue over stereotypes, athletic records, academic records and so forth for days but the real measure of a school is how many porn stars* have come from that school.
I can't wait to see the research projects and results on that one.
*Playmates, Pets will serve as an adequate substitute.
Mustang1991 wrote:Cougar High fans are still bitter over the 41-16 whipping they took in 1992, just three years after hanging 95 on us.
And by the way, how many football national championships (or basketball for that matter) does Cougar High have? Answer: one less than us.
SMU failed to beat a one-win UH team in the following season, ending up settling for a tie. They also accounted for the Coogs' only win the '94 season and SMU was one of only 2 Coog wins in the '95 season.
So basically we owned you even during the worst period in program history. But yeah I'm sure people are still bitter over one isolated loss in the 1992 season.