I see this topic skirted around or discussed in a round about way on the forum often, but never directly addressed.
Do you think that SMU's reputation/stereotype as a school consisting of nothing but stuck up, snobby, rich, white kids from affluent neighborhoods/families hurts our athletic programs' ability to recruit athletes who do not fit that description? (Ie prospective student athletes that would fall under any of the following categories: inner-city/low-income/minority.)