PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Discuss SMU recruiting in this forum.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Postby Stallion » Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:03 am

I have mentioned several times that I thought SMU's HIGH SCHOOL ONLY class rates favorably with the classes of TCU, Baylor, UH, and Rice. In high school recruiting only SMU holds a slight edge over each school based on the more precise secondary rating used by Rivals. The following are the ratings with numbers of HS recruits in parenthesis. SMU 5.28(10), TCU 5.24(12), Baylor 5.15(10), UH 5.13(12)Rice-(really struggling). However, to be fair especially to the Froggies TCU's best recruits are JC players not included in this scale. Surprisingly, competitive is Tulsa at 5.2(13) and that doesn't include 3 three star JUCOs.

<small>[ 01-13-2004, 07:22 AM: Message edited by: Stallion ]</small>
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Postby PerunaPunch » Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:06 am

Stallion,

Can you pull those same stats to compare between our class and the CUSA schools we'll be facing in another couple of years?
"It's a couple hundred million dollars. I'm not losing sleep over it." -- David Miller
User avatar
PerunaPunch
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2681
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX, USA

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Postby dandyfan » Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:22 am

i just saw jon lindley, of sulphur springs, on a basketball court. He is taller than i had expected and his quickness is just plain out of this world. looks like another nice east texas pick up.
dandyfan
 

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Postby Southland » Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:07 pm

Originally posted by Stallion:
I have mentioned several times that I thought SMU's HIGH SCHOOL ONLY class rates favorably with the classes of TCU, Baylor, UH, and Rice. In high school recruiting only SMU holds a slight edge over each school based on the more precise secondary rating used by Rivals. The following are the ratings with numbers of HS recruits in parenthesis. SMU 5.28(10), TCU 5.24(12), Baylor 5.15(10), UH 5.13(12)Rice-(really struggling). However, to be fair especially to the Froggies TCU's best recruits are JC players not included in this scale. Surprisingly, competitive is Tulsa at 5.2(13) and that doesn't include 3 three star JUCOs.
good news.

Not really surprised about Tulsa, since they are the #3 school in that state (as opposed to the seventh/eighth option like SMU, Houston, Rice, Baylor, etc.)

We'll become more successful on the JC level as years progress, and JUCO players realize that we're an option.

We're a redtag policy change away from creating something solid on the non-BCS level.
Southland
Varsity
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 3:01 am

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Postby GoRedGoBlue » Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:47 pm

3rd in a state with 1/8th of the population

Originally posted by Southland:
Originally posted by Stallion:
[b] I have mentioned several times that I thought SMU's HIGH SCHOOL ONLY class rates favorably with the classes of TCU, Baylor, UH, and Rice. In high school recruiting only SMU holds a slight edge over each school based on the more precise secondary rating used by Rivals. The following are the ratings with numbers of HS recruits in parenthesis. SMU 5.28(10), TCU 5.24(12), Baylor 5.15(10), UH 5.13(12)Rice-(really struggling). However, to be fair especially to the Froggies TCU's best recruits are JC players not included in this scale. Surprisingly, competitive is Tulsa at 5.2(13) and that doesn't include 3 three star JUCOs.
good news.

Not really surprised about Tulsa, since they are the #3 school in that state (as opposed to the seventh/eighth option like SMU, Houston, Rice, Baylor, etc.)

We'll become more successful on the JC level as years progress, and JUCO players realize that we're an option.

We're a redtag policy change away from creating something solid on the non-BCS level. [/b]
GoRedGoBlue
Heisman
 
Posts: 1527
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 3:01 am
Location: dallas,tx,usa

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Postby GrapevineMustang » Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:51 pm

Originally posted by dandyfan:
i just saw jon lindley, of sulphur springs, on a basketball court. He is taller than i had expected and his quickness is just plain out of this world. looks like another nice east texas pick up.
I get the impression that he's really impressive. It's good to hear about that quickness, considering he suffered a miniscus injury in his knee in SSHS's season-ending playoff loss to Highland Park.

So how tall is he? I've seen him listed everywhere from 5-10 to 6-1.5. Could you get an accurate read on the guy?
User avatar
GrapevineMustang
All-American
 
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Grapevine

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Postby Stallion » Tue Jan 13, 2004 6:06 pm

6 out of Tulsa's 16 HS recruits are from our own DFW Metroplex including recognized recruits like S Randy Duncan, S Curtis Williams and DT Tommy Daniels.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Postby Southland » Tue Jan 13, 2004 7:05 pm

Originally posted by GoRedGoBlue:
3rd in a state with 1/8th of the population

Originally posted by Southland:
[b]
Originally posted by Stallion:
[b] I have mentioned several times that I thought SMU's HIGH SCHOOL ONLY class rates favorably with the classes of TCU, Baylor, UH, and Rice. In high school recruiting only SMU holds a slight edge over each school based on the more precise secondary rating used by Rivals. The following are the ratings with numbers of HS recruits in parenthesis. SMU 5.28(10), TCU 5.24(12), Baylor 5.15(10), UH 5.13(12)Rice-(really struggling). However, to be fair especially to the Froggies TCU's best recruits are JC players not included in this scale. Surprisingly, competitive is Tulsa at 5.2(13) and that doesn't include 3 three star JUCOs.
good news.

Not really surprised about Tulsa, since they are the #3 school in that state (as opposed to the seventh/eighth option like SMU, Houston, Rice, Baylor, etc.)

We'll become more successful on the JC level as years progress, and JUCO players realize that we're an option.

We're a redtag policy change away from creating something solid on the non-BCS level. [/b]
[/b]
Lot of good football players in Oklahoma, and OU and OSU can't accommodate all the Oklahomans that wants to stay in state. Naturally, they turn to Tulsa next.

Whereas a Texan who wants to stay in state can turn to eight different schools if Texas or Texas A&M aren't interested.
Southland
Varsity
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 3:01 am

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Postby dandyfan » Wed Jan 14, 2004 12:41 pm

I get the impression that he's really impressive. It's good to hear about that quickness, considering he suffered a miniscus injury in his knee in SSHS's season-ending playoff loss to Highland Park.

So how tall is he? I've seen him listed everywhere from 5-10 to 6-1.5. Could you get an accurate read on the guy?

GM,Jon is a legit 5'11'' to 6'0''. And I honestly forgot about the knee injury. He was not wearing a sleeve or anything on the knee so I am assuming he is fully recovered.
dandyfan
 

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Postby Jake Spavital » Sat Jan 24, 2004 10:56 am

asdfasdf
Jake Spavital
Newbie
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 4:01 am
Location: Tulsa

Re: SMU's HS Class Rates Favorably

Postby DallasDiehard » Sat Jan 24, 2004 1:01 pm

Huh? Is there a secret message encoded there?
Rise up, Mustang Nation!
Go SMU!
User avatar
DallasDiehard
Heisman
 
Posts: 1836
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas


Return to Recruiting

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest