New RB Offer

by **expony18** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:55 pm

looks like he has potential

http://smu.rivals.com/default.asp

by **Mustang22** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:24 am

Speed, speed, speed. I like the looks of him.

by **davidpaul123** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:11 am

http://smu.scout.com/2/843822.html

by **SMU 86** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:00 am

davidpaul123 wrote:http://smu.scout.com/2/843822.html

Good interview with his coach. (free content as well)

by **Stallion** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:21 am

Wow! with those grades he could go to SMU Law School and establish Murphy's Law.

by **The PonyGrad** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:56 pm

Stallion wrote:Wow! with those grades he could go to SMU Law School and establish Murphy's Law.

I thought MBB and Footbal already established that.

:shock:

by **The PonyGrad** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:57 pm

The PonyGrad wrote:
Stallion wrote:Wow! with those grades he could go to SMU Law School and establish Murphy's Law.

I thought MBB and Footbal already established that.

If he can rescind it, now we are talking!!

by **SMU21TCU10** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 2:04 pm

Do these RB offers not understand they will play a minimum of 3 years if they come here!! Kendial would have started 4 years had he come. He would have gotten at least 10 carries a game not to mention several catches out of the backfield. Hopefully a RB realizes the potential this year. JJ had 2 RB's go over 1 k at Hawaii.

by **kull** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:04 pm

SMU21TCU10 wrote:Do these RB offers not understand they will play a minimum of 3 years if they come here!! Kendial would have started 4 years had he come. He would have gotten at least 10 carries a game not to mention several catches out of the backfield. Hopefully a RB realizes the potential this year. JJ had 2 RB's go over 1 k at Hawaii.

nate ilaoa came close, a few yards short of a 1000 rushing

by **Garret** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:18 pm

kull wrote:
nate ilaoa came close, a few yards short of a 1000 rushing

Yes, but Nate missed a lot of playing time due to injury that season. Both RBs from that 2006 season (Nate and Reagan) were drafted by the NFL after the season...amazing when you consider how neither were recruited to Hawaii as RBs and how few non-BCS conference teams get two RBs drafted in any year.

by **ALEX LIFESON** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 7:22 pm

Garret wrote:
kull wrote:
nate ilaoa came close, a few yards short of a 1000 rushing

Yes, but Nate missed a lot of playing time due to injury that season. Both RBs from that 2006 season (Nate and Reagan) were drafted by the NFL after the season...amazing when you consider how neither were recruited to Hawaii as RBs and how few non-BCS conference teams get two RBs drafted in any year.

Garret, your insite is always appreciated!

by **kull** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:19 pm

Garret wrote:
kull wrote:
nate ilaoa came close, a few yards short of a 1000 rushing

Yes, but Nate missed a lot of playing time due to injury that season. Both RBs from that 2006 season (Nate and Reagan) were drafted by the NFL after the season...amazing when you consider how neither were recruited to Hawaii as RBs and how few non-BCS conference teams get two RBs drafted in any year.

It's to bad Nate wasn't 100% for the Oregon State game in 2006. Not bad for a slot that got overweight

by **Stallion** » Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:19 pm

Update on Marcus Murphy (who I think would be dynamite in this offense). Noted that he wasn't mentioned as visitor to SMU "scrimmage". He was busy in Austin at the Texas Relays where his team DeSoto made the finals in both the 4 x 100 Relays and 4 X 200 Relays. Finished 3rd in 4 x 200 but his team scratched in the Finals in the 4 x 100 Relays. Still if you're familiar with the Texas Relays you got to go through competitive preliminaries just to make it to the Finals. Just making the Relay Squad for DeSoto is an accomplishment

http://www.texassports.com/livestats/m- ... /index.htm

by **Alaric** » Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:08 pm

Stallion wrote:Update on Marcus Murphy (who I think would be dynamite in this offense).

"dynamite"? who stole Stallion's password?

by **SMU21TCU10** » Tue Apr 07, 2009 12:06 am

Murphy has a 4.2 GPA

How is it possible to have a 4.2 on a 4.0 scale? I guess they use a different system

New RB Offer

New RB Offer

Who is online