ESPN's CUSA Spring Football Analysis

by **George S. Patton** » Mon May 11, 2009 12:01 pm

Graham Watson was pretty on target about SMU, IMO.

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/others/0-4-3 ... arned.html

by **HFvictory** » Mon May 11, 2009 12:55 pm

SMU won't challenge traditional powers Houston, Rice and Tulsa,

What???????

by PK » Mon May 11, 2009 2:25 pm

Is there now a new definition of "traditional"? :roll:

by **mr. pony** » Tue May 12, 2009 6:58 am

Uh, run-and-shoot offenses don't "[establish] a running game."

by **ready4abowl** » Wed May 13, 2009 11:16 am

HFvictory wrote:SMU won't challenge traditional powers Houston, Rice and Tulsa,

What???????

I believe they are referring to Conf USA

by **HFvictory** » Wed May 13, 2009 4:07 pm

ready4abowl wrote:
HFvictory wrote:SMU won't challenge traditional powers Houston, Rice and Tulsa,

What???????

I believe they are referring to Conf USA

Since joining C-USA Rice is 1-10, 7-6, 3-10 & 10-3. Please explain.

by **mrydel** » Wed May 13, 2009 6:17 pm

HFvictory wrote:
ready4abowl wrote:
HFvictory wrote:SMU won't challenge traditional powers Houston, Rice and Tulsa,

What???????

I believe they are referring to Conf USA

Since joining C-USA Rice is 1-10, 7-6, 3-10 & 10-3. Please explain.

Apparently they are looking at it from the SMU perspective over that time period.

by **mustang1108** » Thu May 14, 2009 9:47 am

i like how they said we wont challenge powers like houston and tulsa when we should have beaten both of them had we not blown the game in the 4th quarter last year. in the tulsa game we gave up 13 points in the 4th quarter dropped a sure game winning td as we lost by 6 and against houston we gave up 21 4th quarter points and lose by 6 again. if our d could just play slightly better we can easily be middle of the pack in the conference.

by **kull** » Thu May 14, 2009 10:45 am

mustang1108 wrote:i like how they said we wont challenge powers like houston and tulsa when we should have beaten both of them had we not blown the game in the 4th quarter last year. in the tulsa game we gave up 13 points in the 4th quarter dropped a sure game winning td as we lost by 6 and against houston we gave up 21 4th quarter points and lose by 6 again. if our d could just play slightly better we can easily be middle of the pack in the conference.

and that was with the high school level execution of JJ's offense.

by **One Trick Pony** » Thu May 14, 2009 10:46 am

DonÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t expect any resemblance of respect until SMU football consistently wins football games. Even as conference champs we will still be emerged in a non BCS neighborhood. Respect you earn it!

ESPN's CUSA Spring Football Analysis

ESPN's CUSA Spring Football Analysis

Who is online