Monday conditioning workout notes

by **George S. Patton** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:02 pm

PonyPride wrote:
George S. Patton wrote:Not sure about the Josh LeRibus situation but can you find out if he's indeed coming to these workouts at all...
Already did. He has a conflict, so he is working out with a trainer, and reportedly will be ready for two-a-days.

I hope his teammates are cool with that.

by **OC Mustang** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:23 pm

George S. Patton wrote:
PonyPride wrote:
George S. Patton wrote:Not sure about the Josh LeRibus situation but can you find out if he's indeed coming to these workouts at all...
Already did. He has a conflict, so he is working out with a trainer, and reportedly will be ready for two-a-days.

I hope his teammates are cool with that.

As long as he is getting his proper training in and performs once he show up, his teammates should be supportive of that.

by **George S. Patton** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:28 pm

OC Mustang wrote:
George S. Patton wrote:
PonyPride wrote:
George S. Patton wrote:Not sure about the Josh LeRibus situation but can you find out if he's indeed coming to these workouts at all...
Already did. He has a conflict, so he is working out with a trainer, and reportedly will be ready for two-a-days.

I hope his teammates are cool with that.

As long as he is getting his proper training in and performs once he show up, his teammates should be supportive of that.

Band of brothers

by **MustangMan** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:28 pm

Sure, that would be ideal, but aren't these workouts technically "voluntary"? I know, they're Jimmy Johnson-style "voluntary," but still, he doesn't have to be there. If he has a legitimate reason and the coaches are cool with it, that's the end of it.

by **George S. Patton** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:37 pm

MustangMan wrote:Sure, that would be ideal, but aren't these workouts technically "voluntary"? I know, they're Jimmy Johnson-style "voluntary," but still, he doesn't have to be there. If he has a legitimate reason and the coaches are cool with it, that's the end of it.

No, it's the players and coaches who have to be cool with it.

by **SMU21TCU10** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:24 pm

George S. Patton wrote:
MustangMan wrote:Sure, that would be ideal, but aren't these workouts technically "voluntary"? I know, they're Jimmy Johnson-style "voluntary," but still, he doesn't have to be there. If he has a legitimate reason and the coaches are cool with it, that's the end of it.

No, it's the players and coaches who have to be cool with it.

Dude let him have a little summer break away from campus

by **George S. Patton** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:58 pm

SMU21TCU10 wrote:
George S. Patton wrote:
MustangMan wrote:Sure, that would be ideal, but aren't these workouts technically "voluntary"? I know, they're Jimmy Johnson-style "voluntary," but still, he doesn't have to be there. If he has a legitimate reason and the coaches are cool with it, that's the end of it.

No, it's the players and coaches who have to be cool with it.

Dude let him have a little summer break away from campus

He got a couple of weeks when school let out in May. I really hope you're not serious about this because this is the kind of mentality that fosters 3-9, 1-11 seasons. It's called accountability.

It's the little things, folks.

by **southerncomfort** » Wed Jul 22, 2009 12:41 am

Good grief, why don't we just drop the Josh LeRibeus issue. Yall do realise PP just cleared that up and I HIGHLY DOUBT that his friends and teammates are going to give him crap for more than a few hours. There are bigger things to worry about, like winning. Unless we see him lagging behind or something negative, let's just DROP THE NEGATIVITY like we can foresee the future. It's just stupid.

by **Corso** » Wed Jul 22, 2009 12:46 am

southerncomfort wrote:Good grief, why don't we just drop the Josh LeRibeus issue. Yall do realise PP just cleared that up and I HIGHLY DOUBT that his friends and teammates are going to give him crap for more than a few hours. There are bigger things to worry about, like winning. Unless we see him lagging behind or something negative, let's just DROP THE NEGATIVITY like we can foresee the future. It's just stupid.

No kidding.

George S. Patton wrote:It's the little things, folks.

No, that's not repetitive.

That's not repetitive.

That's not repetitive ...

by **George S. Patton** » Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:31 am

southerncomfort wrote:Good grief, why don't we just drop the Josh LeRibeus issue. Yall do realise PP just cleared that up and I HIGHLY DOUBT that his friends and teammates are going to give him crap for more than a few hours. There are bigger things to worry about, like winning. Unless we see him lagging behind or something negative, let's just DROP THE NEGATIVITY like we can foresee the future. It's just stupid.

I realize -- not realise -- that. There's nothing negative about the LeRibus issue. I just pointed out that if his teammates and coaches are fine with his conflict, then OK. But the winning will occur when the little things are taken care of.

When it comes to football, you need every single facet running in concert with each other on and off the field.

It's the little things, folks!

by **jtstang** » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:12 am

How come you know so much about little things general?

by **George S. Patton** » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:14 am

jtstang wrote:How come you know so much about little things general?

LIttle things mean a lot

by **jtstang** » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:14 am

Your wife says that too?

by **abezontar** » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:19 am

jtstang wrote:Your wife says that too?

Hey-o!!!

by **OC Mustang** » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:25 am

abezontar wrote:
jtstang wrote:Your wife says that too?

Hey-o!!!

Awww...man, General, you teed up a friggin' softball. It shouldn't be that easy.

Monday conditioning workout notes

Re: Monday conditioning workout notes

Re: Monday conditioning workout notes

Re: Monday conditioning workout notes

Who is online