We're No. 61 All-Time

by **HB Pony Dad** » Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:19 pm

Prestige Rankings: Nos. 1-119

1. Oklahoma: 1,986
2. USC: 1,897
3. Ohio State: 1,655
4. Notre Dame: 1,579
5. Nebraska: 1,553
6. Alabama: 1,534
7. Texas: 1,494
8. Michigan: 1,332
9. Florida State: 1,110
10. Miami: 1,109

...

61.SMU: 138
62. Rice: 137
63. Baylor: 129
64. Tulsa: 123
65. Oklahoma State: 115
66. Virginia: 101
67. Southern Miss: 99
68. Bowling Green: 94
T-69. Kentucky: 86
T-69. Kansas: 86

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4369664

Also 24th in the 80's and tied for 113th in the 90's...

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3852242

by **The PonyGrad** » Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:21 pm

Beat Rice!

by **PonyKai** » Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:25 pm

Bummer it doesn't count our National Championship that we won. And our various indiscretions during the 80's cost us 24 points...ouch. Add that 24 and we climb a few spots.

by **KnuckleStang** » Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:32 pm

Perhaps I'm ignorant of their illustrious fb history going way back, but does anybody else question Boise St. and Fresno ranked ahead of us ALL TIME.

by **The PonyGrad** » Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:40 pm

KnuckleStang wrote:Perhaps I'm ignorant of their illustrious fb history going way back, but does anybody else question Boise St. and Fresno ranked ahead of us ALL TIME.

Certainly Boise St.

by **kull** » Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:43 pm

fry rice!

by **PurplFrawg** » Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:44 pm

You seemed to have overlooked TCU, tied at #31.

by **SoCal_Pony** » Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:46 pm

I have no idea why UT would be ranked over SMU during the 80â€™sâ€¦.that was not a great decade for them if I recall.

by **RednBlue11** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:23 am

so the 2 winning-est football programs in NCAA history don't even make the top 5?....this is shamefully wrong.

by **RednBlue11** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:25 am

I would also like to point out that Texas A&M is at No. 20...they haven't gotten close to winning a title since 1997 and they haven't ACTUALLY won a title since the mid 30's if i remember correctly...and this makes them prestigious because???

by **ponyboy** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:08 pm

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=23281&p=201829#p201829

by **RednBlue11** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:17 pm

ponyboy wrote:http://www.ponyfans.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=23281&p=201829#p201829

its just a yelling match between you and stallion while saying the same thing in different ways.

by **ponyboy** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:20 pm

Point is it sheds light on SMU football history. The glory years ended when Doak went to Detroit.

by **RednBlue11** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:26 pm

ponyboy wrote:Point is it sheds light on SMU football history. The glory years ended when Doak went to Detroit.

the early 80's seem like they were fun...but i understand why we are so far down the list. I think we could move up a couple spots though.

by **ponyboy** » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:53 pm

They were fun. Highlight for me was watching SMU crush UT down in Austin the first time. But the disappointment when it all fell apart was even more crushing.

We're No. 61 All-Time

We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Re: We're No. 61 All-Time

Who is online