We're not in the top 40?

by **KnuckleStang** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:49 pm

This list has no credibility! Wait, maybe they're talking about hot chicks who actually stay through the 2nd quarter...

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/244543-college-footballs-40-hottest-fanbases

by **ponydawg** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:53 pm

best post ever.

by **crazy horse** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:11 pm

Send this to Orsini.

I thought we were supposed to be Top 25 in EVERYTHING we do!

by **SMU21TCU10** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:17 pm

Texas A & M at 10?!?!?!?! it should be in the bottom 10. When i went to SMU i saw pretty girls everywhere. Every class was loaded. Walks between classes were extremely enjoyable with all the amazing women. Living in the co-ed dorms was AWESOME.

When i walk through the A & M campus i honestly hardly ever see really pretty girls. No joke. In a class of 200 people there will maybe be 3 or 4 good looking girls. This list sucks.

UT and Ole miss have 500 times better looking girls than A & M... Yet they are way behind them on the list

by **One Trick Pony** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:41 pm

Nebraska BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH HAHA H HAHA HAH AH AHAHHAHAHAHH
This guys on drugs.

LSU girls look like they could hurt you!

UCF has great looking women!

SMU women are beautifull

by **kull** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:44 pm

A&M @ 10; fail.

Minnesota, Oregon, Oregon State, Ohio State, LSU, any California school (except Fresno) UNLV, UW, ASU= Prime

there is some nice beaver in Nebraska, but they go to Creighton

by **EastStang** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:41 pm

Penn State, Maryland, Wisconsin, A&M, Tech all ahead of SMU? Are they on drugs? Perhaps they like slutty chicks instead of hot with a touch of class. From the pictures, skankiness seemed to be the MO they followed.

by **down n out** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:29 pm

how do i get that job??

by **ponyte** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:44 pm

Not to sound too skeptical, but a couple of those pictures looked more like professionals than students. Was the judging based on the best pics available? Or did the judge(s) actually go to campus and make a determination?

by **jtstang** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:13 pm

EastStang wrote:Perhaps they like slutty chicks instead of hot with a touch of class. From the pictures, skankiness seemed to be the MO they followed.

You say that like there's something wrong with it.

by **EastStang** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:16 pm

Well, Skanks do have a certain joi d' vive'.

by **Mustangsabu** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:31 pm

EastStang wrote:Well, Skanks do have a certain joi d' vive'.

But SMU girls have class and therefore "joie de vivre"

by **jtstang** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:34 pm

Nobody here is any danger of marrying any of the chicks on the 'vard, so who gives a crap about class? Big [deleted] are the order of the day.

by **EastStang** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:55 pm

Come on jt, you've gotten more tail than Daniel Boone's coonskin cap factory.

by **StallionsModelT** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:27 pm

I've been thinking about red and blue sundresses all offseason. Damn its good to be a Mustang

We're not in the top 40?

We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Re: We're not in the top 40?

Who is online