PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

SFA Game Takeaway

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: SFA Game Takeaway

Postby WorldStang » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:09 am

SFA finished 5th in their conference last year.. I'm sure that makes everyone feel much better.
What we obtain too cheap.. we esteem too lightly. It is persistence alone that gives everything its value.
User avatar
WorldStang
All-American
 
Posts: 992
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Allen, TX

Re: SFA Game Takeaway

Postby westexSMU » Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:21 am

That was the worst performance by an SMU team Ive seen since 1989-1991 including the 0-12 team of 2003.We won because JJ figured out BLM couldn't pass tonight and McNeel did the rest. Why he wouldn't give Smith or someone else a chance is beyond me, but we won. Without alot of improvement in our passing game, it will be hard to win again against anyone else on our schedule.
User avatar
westexSMU
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2303
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:03 pm
Location: Mustang Island

Re: SFA Game Takeaway

Postby smupony » Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:53 am

Big Hoss wrote:
JasonB wrote:Defense is way better than last year. They only called one real blitz the whole game (yes, they rush Yenga every down, but that just makes it a 4 man rush), and that was at the end of the game on the sack. DL did very well for most of the night, and QB was pressured even though not sacked.

IF (and maybe it is a big if) BLM plays a halfway decent game, this is a 52-9 whooping. R&S teams simply can't win when a QB plays THAT poorly. Period. It is an absolutle miracle that we were able to win this game when he played that bad. Because of it, the D was absolutley gassed when the other team went hurryup at the end of the second quarter. add to that they started throwing the screens, they wore those corners out and they didn't recover the whole game.


Speaking of the D being gassed, did anyone else see McCann on the sidelines in the 4th quarter? He was sitting on the bench, and it looked like he may have been throwing up, or getting ready to. One guy actually brought the large trash can over to him but he waived him off.


It was reported that McCann had the flu as well. He decided to play because he got sick earlier in th week than Brooks and Bell.
User avatar
smupony
All-American
 
Posts: 881
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 4:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: SFA Game Takeaway

Postby Big Hoss » Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:02 am

smupony wrote:
Big Hoss wrote:
JasonB wrote:Defense is way better than last year. They only called one real blitz the whole game (yes, they rush Yenga every down, but that just makes it a 4 man rush), and that was at the end of the game on the sack. DL did very well for most of the night, and QB was pressured even though not sacked.

IF (and maybe it is a big if) BLM plays a halfway decent game, this is a 52-9 whooping. R&S teams simply can't win when a QB plays THAT poorly. Period. It is an absolutle miracle that we were able to win this game when he played that bad. Because of it, the D was absolutley gassed when the other team went hurryup at the end of the second quarter. add to that they started throwing the screens, they wore those corners out and they didn't recover the whole game.


Speaking of the D being gassed, did anyone else see McCann on the sidelines in the 4th quarter? He was sitting on the bench, and it looked like he may have been throwing up, or getting ready to. One guy actually brought the large trash can over to him but he waived him off.


It was reported that McCann had the flu as well. He decided to play because he got sick earlier in th week than Brooks and Bell.


Ah, that explains it. I would hate to think what our D would be like this year if McCann's conditioning was questionable.
Big Hoss
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3179
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:02 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: SFA Game Takeaway

Postby bagice » Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:18 am

No way anyone can state the defense is better with our only game being against a non FBS school that is not even that good in their own conference. As many have stated, and I concur, this team looked as bad as any team back in the post DP days, including the 1989 team...

I hope we were just flat and didn't take them seriously and can turn it around, but if you can't get up to play the first game of the season, regardless of the opponent, that makes you have to question the team's makeup.

Before we go proclaiming this defense better than last year, lets see how they do at UAB, who just hung 44 on Rice.
Womack + Wishbone = Heisman

Class of 89
User avatar
bagice
Heisman
 
Posts: 1695
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:10 pm
Location: Plano, Tx.

Re: SFA Game Takeaway

Postby JasonB » Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:35 am

bagice wrote:No way anyone can state the defense is better with our only game being against a non FBS school that is not even that good in their own conference. As many have stated, and I concur, this team looked as bad as any team back in the post DP days, including the 1989 team...

I hope we were just flat and didn't take them seriously and can turn it around, but if you can't get up to play the first game of the season, regardless of the opponent, that makes you have to question the team's makeup.

Before we go proclaiming this defense better than last year, lets see how they do at UAB, who just hung 44 on Rice.


The D last night looked much better than they did against the same level of opponent last season. I don't think you remember how we absolutely could not stop sam houston.
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7226
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Re: SFA Game Takeaway

Postby bagice » Sun Sep 06, 2009 10:40 am

I am still going to withhold judgement, seems to me they moved the ball pretty good against us, they just had a lot of turnovers...During crunch time, they tore up some good chunks..one drive they fumbled while in field goal range, another drive they missed a FG that was less than 40 yards.
Womack + Wishbone = Heisman

Class of 89
User avatar
bagice
Heisman
 
Posts: 1695
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 6:10 pm
Location: Plano, Tx.

Re: SFA Game Takeaway

Postby davidpaul123 » Sun Sep 06, 2009 7:17 pm

If we dont have Shawnbrey and make some plays in the kicking game we dont win this game. I like the fact that Jones ran the ball more than you would normally think when he realized Bo was off. I am hopeful this was just a bad outing by Bo but thank goodness we have a stud running back.

The defense looked improved over last years squad. I think they still need to find a way to get more pressure on the QB. Kennemer had a nice game.
Image
User avatar
davidpaul123
Heisman
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: SFA Game Takeaway

Postby Goose Egg » Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:54 pm

Someone earlier mentioned even an ugly win is still a win. Sometimes an ugly win can be a humbling reality check for coaches and players, and be a wake up call to better prepare for the next game, or take game preparation more serious.

Clock management was poor, personnel management poor, sideline management poor, dropped passes, poor play selection at times, lack of intensity, etc. etc. etc. Players have to execute and play, but, coaches have to prepare players and themselves. They weren't ready. SFA was!!!
I hope this "ugly win" wakes everyone up, or, the other comments on this strand will become a true 1-11 reality very soon. But, as Coach Jones would put it, the boys just don't know my system yet. It's always the players fault and not the coaches. Not this game. I hang it on the coaches.
Goose Egg
Newbie
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:38 pm

Previous

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest