Come on Guys..

by **SMU21TCU10** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:44 pm

It was probably just the stomach bug... :lol:

by **jason54858** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:47 pm

SMU21TCU10 wrote:It was probably just the stomach bug...

You joke about that, but how else do you explain him looking good in Alabama and then laying a goose egg in Washington who is a lesser opponent?

by **SMU 86** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:48 pm

jason54858 wrote:
SMU21TCU10 wrote:It was probably just the stomach bug...

You joke about that, but how else do you explain him looking good in Alabama and then laying a goose egg in Washington who is a lesser opponent?

Are you related to BLM?

by **SMU21TCU10** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:48 pm

he only good good at UAB for 1 1/2 quarters

by **CalallenStang** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:49 pm

He looked better against WSU than he did against UAB. The difference is that the WSU INTs came at more inopportune times.

by **jason54858** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:50 pm

SMU 86 wrote:
jason54858 wrote:
SMU21TCU10 wrote:It was probably just the stomach bug...

You joke about that, but how else do you explain him looking good in Alabama and then laying a goose egg in Washington who is a lesser opponent?

Are you related to BLM?

Yeah im is brother
My name is Bo Wrangler Mitchell

by **SMU21TCU10** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:51 pm

by **jason54858** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:51 pm

CalallenStang wrote:He looked better against WSU than he did against UAB. The difference is that the WSU INTs came at more inopportune times.

The point is he won the game. Forget how many yards the kid accomulated during the game.

by **CalallenStang** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:53 pm

jason54858 wrote:
CalallenStang wrote:He looked better against WSU than he did against UAB. The difference is that the WSU INTs came at more inopportune times.

The point is he won the game. Forget how many yards the kid accomulated during the game.

Defense won that game with takeaways and with the big stop.

by **SMU21TCU10** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:53 pm

No our blocked FG won the game because it made them go for the 2

by **SMU 86** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:54 pm

Ok BWM.

by **jason54858** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:56 pm

SMU21TCU10 wrote:No our blocked FG won the game because it made them go for the 2

True but............true

by **Charleston Pony** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:00 pm

BLM has looked good when he has had time to throw. He's made bad decisions when under pressure. How unusual. I didn't get to see his bad plays tonight but would guess that pattern held true. I seem to recall the announcers talking about his being pressured on a couple of those picks tonight. Can't comment on his accuracy.

Today's game is history.

Remains to be seen what the rest of the year will bring, but I have to say I certainly didn't expect to start these 1st 3 games with 2 wins. It's actually what I'd hoped for in order to have any chance at improving over last year.

I'm assuming we lose our next 5 games and I honestly felt that if we had started this season 1-7, we might not improve on last year's 1-11 and all momentum JJ has created could be lost.

Despite this very disappointing loss, this program is improving.

by **couch 'em** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:05 pm

Vote in my poll, and we'll find out the next excuse!

http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=357&f=1264&t=4791854

by **J.T.supporta** » Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:08 pm

im going with Stockholm syndrome

Come on Guys..

Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Re: Come on Guys..

Who is online