more later

by **Nacho** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:35 pm

http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com/

with the more later ending kate seems to be saying there will be more later. at least that's the way i read it.

could we see some changes on the o?

by **RGV Pony** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:45 pm

Nacho wrote:http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com/

with the more later ending kate seems to be saying there will be more later. at least that's the way i read it.

could we see some changes on the o?

she always puts that.

More later...

by **Stallion** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:47 pm

Let me boil this down. Since we didn't see a backup Saturday Nite-there is no plans for a backup to play except in an emergency.

by **Nacho** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:52 pm

i know someone who refuses to go to any more smu games as long as bm is the qb. i'm not there yet but i'm getting close. not to bag on the guy but i have zero confidence in him.

mccown or bm? i asked someone this the othe other day. now that is a tough one.

by **Hoop Fan** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:58 pm

Gotta say McCown, easy, all day long. particulary based on what he did with apparently better coaching after he left here, and then went to NFL. Can you imagine what JJ could have done with McCown by "coaching him up"? Better question remains, BLM or Willis? Or BLM vs Unnamed Average Ordinary Pedestrian Juco Prospect?

by **Nacho** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:05 pm

as much as i hate how mccown left after cavan gave him every chance in the world (sound familiar) i guess i have to agree but it kind of makes me hate myself.

by **CalallenStang** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:09 pm

Hoop Fan wrote:BLM vs Unnamed Average Ordinary Pedestrian Juco Prospect?

I'll take UAOPJP

by **Hoop Fan** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:11 pm

by the way Nacho, you were really grasping for straws on the 'more later' reference. Are you feeling desperate as far as SMU football goes or something? Geez, relax. You've waited 20+ years now, whats 4 or 5 more while we either start over at qb or forge ahead with a below average qb? Cmon, get happy.

by **Nacho** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:27 pm

i honestly think this team could be so much better with a decent qb. not a great team but a pretty good one. one good enough to go 6-6. with the current o i don't see it happening. very frustrating.

by **NickSMU17** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:36 pm

McCown would not have been able to grasp this offense just like BLM.

by **BRStang** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:34 pm

NickSMU17 wrote:McCown would not have been able to grasp this offense just like BLM.

I did not see BLM play this week or at WSU, but it is my understanding it is not a lack of "grasping" the offense. It is a matter of talent.

by **CalallenStang** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:53 pm

Nacho wrote:i honestly think this team could be so much better with a decent qb. not a great team but a pretty good one. one good enough to go 6-6. with the current o i don't see it happening. very frustrating.

With a decent QB, this team would be good enough to go 8-4, but probably still wouldn't because we are, after all, SMU.

by **Stallion** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:56 pm

yea if we only had a seasoned, experienced 4 year starting Senior QB we'd have it made-but where are you going to find one of them

by **CalallenStang** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:31 pm

Stallion wrote:yea if we only had a seasoned, experienced 4 year starting Senior QB we'd have it made-but where are you going to find one of them

What if it was BLM in his 4th year, want to take a guess on how that would go?

by **SMU21TCU10** » Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:36 pm

CalallenStang wrote:
Stallion wrote:yea if we only had a seasoned, experienced 4 year starting Senior QB we'd have it made-but where are you going to find one of them

What if it was BLM in his 4th year, want to take a guess on how that would go?

1-11

more later

more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Re: more later

Who is online