|
Hindsight 20/20Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Hindsight 20/20I know hindsight is 20/20...but, does anyone else think we should have gone for 2 on that last touchdown? Before we even scored, i texted my buddy and said we should go for 2 if we score..sure enough, the very next play AR catches a TD pass... normally, i would only suggest this on the road. But given the opponent who picks up chunks of yardage at will..I think our chances would have been better to convert two than beating navy in OT (given our opponent and recent overtime track record)...just a thought...opinions?
Re: Hindsight 20/20Considering our record in OT - maybe so.
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and
doesn't care who wins. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
Re: Hindsight 20/20I think we go for 2 if we are in that situation again this year.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown
________________________Champion________________________ ![]()
Re: Hindsight 20/20No way! Take it to OT and win it there.
If you go for 2 you've reduced the game down to one play. If you get it into OT you have at least 4 downs to make it happen. Unfortunately we failed on all 4.
Re: Hindsight 20/20I'm not going to second guess that decision but you got to realize a running team like Navy has a big advantage over a Run and Shoot team in Overtime. I did suggest before Overtime started that Jones should consider going for 2.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Re: Hindsight 20/20
Exactly, your crazy to think we have a better chance to win in OT against Navy's tripple option especially when they have most of the momentum and scored 31 2nd half points, as opposed to one play from the 2.5 yard line. Id take My chances going for two..
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests |
|