PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby Dutch » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:33 pm

lets not get ahead of ourselves. this is like Cincy and TCU worrying about an invitation to play in the national championship game.
Ok this is getting ridiculous...I agree with Dutch on THIS ONE POST by him totally
User avatar
Dutch
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4377
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:56 pm
Location: 75205

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby RGV Pony » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:37 pm

Dutch wrote:lets not get ahead of ourselves. this is like Cincy and TCU worrying about an invitation to play in the national championship game.


or BYU threatening to sue the BCS for not being in the national championship game...right before going to play JJ's Warriors in Hawaii
User avatar
RGV Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 17269
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby PonySoprano » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:40 pm

2009 Bowl Payouts
St. Petersburg $1 million
New Orleans $325k
Hawaii $398k
Eagle Bank $1 million
Armed Forces $600k
Liberty $1.7 million
"It'd be nice to see Jesse Henderson break one here."
User avatar
PonySoprano
Heisman
 
Posts: 1053
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 5:44 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby Dutch » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:40 pm

just saw this nugget...

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4616889

INDIANAPOLIS -- Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe wants the NCAA to treat teams with 6-6 records the same as teams with winning records when it comes to bowl games.

Under current rules, teams with .500 records can receive a bowl bid only if the school's conference already has a deal with a bowl and all other teams with winning records have been invited to postseason games.

Beebe's proposal would eliminate those exceptions and permit 6-6 teams to be accepted immediately.

Consideration of the Big 12's proposal could lead to a broader discussion about the bowl system.

The Big 12's proposal is expected to be discussed during the NCAA convention in January.
Ok this is getting ridiculous...I agree with Dutch on THIS ONE POST by him totally
User avatar
Dutch
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4377
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:56 pm
Location: 75205

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby CalallenStang » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:44 pm

huskerpony wrote:
CalallenStang wrote:
i.e. in, for instance, the Big XII, the 4th place team in the standings (I think it's the 4th best) automatically goes to the Holiday Bowl, the 7th place (I think) automatically goes to the Texas Bowl, etc.

We don't have that in CUSA. If you are the 3rd place team in the standings, you aren't automatically assigned to, say, the Armed Forces Bowl. If you are the 2nd place team, you aren't automatically assigned to the Hawaii Bowl, etc.

That being said, CUSA has an order for bowls to be able to pick the teams they want. That order is
1) Liberty
2) Hawaii
3 through 6) Everyone else (free-for-all)



Big 12 doesn't have automatic tie-ins either.

Nebraska got selected ahead for the Gator Bowl last year.
I think Okie St. jumped someone a couple of years ago too.
Cotton Bowl often takes the #3 team instead of #2. (They are unlikely to take the loser of the Big 12 championship game when it is played at Jerry World. Most fans won't make 2 road trips to Dallas in 1 month.)
It's all about ticket sales.
Hence why Notre Dame is always in a better bowl game than they deserve.

ACC has some rules about not selecting a team with more than one additional loss than than the next best team available. Pretty sure that does not exist in the Big 12, as all bowl revenue is split between the schools.


Yeah, that's right. I think Big 10 has some selection rules.
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby CalallenStang » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:46 pm

huskerpony wrote:It is my understanding that they don't have to choose from a 7-5 team. They just have to make sure the 7-5 teams are accounted for. ie: if there are 4 teams that are 7-5 and 5 bowls available, they can take the 6-6 team, and the other 4 bowls would be forced to choose from the 7-5 teams.


Yes
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby Stallion » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:53 pm

CallallenStang-what the deal with this claim on the CUSA Board that the Big 10 has an alternate spot in the EagleBank Bowl. I can't see anything from 2009 that says that is correct. That would be pretty important if we are left with 5 Bowls
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby davidpaul123 » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:54 pm

PonySoprano wrote:2009 Bowl Payouts
St. Petersburg $1 million
New Orleans $325k
Hawaii $398k
Eagle Bank $1 million
Armed Forces $600k
Liberty $1.7 million


:shock:
the differences between the payouts are substantial. does cusa share the bowl payouts?
Image
User avatar
davidpaul123
Heisman
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby CalallenStang » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:57 pm

Stallion wrote:CallallenStang-what the deal with this claim on the CUSA Board that the Big 10 has an alternate spot in the EagleBank Bowl. I can't see anything from 2009 that says that is correct. That would be pretty important if we are left with 5 Bowls


I researched that a few weeks ago and I think what it is is if CUSA cannot provide a backup for Army then Big 10 gets this; on the other side if ACC doesn't have enough teams and the MAC can't fill, Big 10 gets in. Those agreements change from year to year and next year if Navy can't fill then Big 10 fills and if they can't then CUSA gets it (if I remember right)
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby Billy Joe » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:20 pm

This is weird talking about bowl games. It sure is more fun than talking about 'next year' or 'wait until the new recruits get here' or 'we need a new coach and [fill in the blank] is available'
User avatar
Billy Joe
All-American
 
Posts: 946
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:34 am

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby mr. pony » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:27 pm

CalallenStang wrote:
mr. pony wrote:
CalallenStang wrote:And further, the article is wrong in stating that "The AutoZone Liberty Bowl in Memphis takes the C-USA champion." Liberty has first pick and typically prefers the champion, but it's not an automatic. They can take another team if they think that team will sell more tickets.


Ah, so that's Jones' out.
We go to Hawaii - even as conference champs.
Those wheels are likely being greased as we type.


From my sources, we will go to Hawaii UNLESS we are conference champs AND are invited to the Liberty Bowl - for what it's worth.


Yeah, I'm just saying word gets out SMU wants Hawaii REAL bad, so "please don't invite us, Liberty Bowl, wink, wink."

Still I can't see turning down the prestige of playing on Jan. 2 in a $1.8 mil bowl....
:shock:
mr. pony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby bubba pony » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:57 pm

PonySoprano wrote:2009 Bowl Payouts
St. Petersburg $1 million
New Orleans $325k
Hawaii $398k
Eagle Bank $1 million
Armed Forces $600k
Liberty $1.7 million


very interesting numbers. how many alumni can afford to pay for last minute tickets to Hawaii, hotel, meals during Christmas break? today on American Airline DFW/HON/DFW non stop $1760. out Dec 23 return Dec 26.

does June's popularity in Hawaii generate enough expectation he can fill the stadium with locals?
bubba pony
Heisman
 
Posts: 1560
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 3:01 am

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby CalallenStang » Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:58 pm

bubba pony wrote:does June's popularity in Hawaii generate enough expectation he can fill the stadium with locals?


That's the key question and the answer is yes
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby davidpaul123 » Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:01 pm

bubba pony wrote:very interesting numbers. how many alumni can afford to pay for last minute tickets to Hawaii, hotel, meals during Christmas break? today on American Airline DFW/HON/DFW non stop $1760. out Dec 23 return Dec 26.

does June's popularity in Hawaii generate enough expectation he can fill the stadium with locals?


I think that traditionally the Hawaii bowl is mostly locals, thats why its usually so crucial that Hawaii is bowl eligible. June would be more of a story and create a better drawn than any of the other options.
Image
User avatar
davidpaul123
Heisman
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: DMN: No bowl 'pecking order' after Liberty

Postby mr. pony » Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:47 pm

CalallenStang wrote:
bubba pony wrote:does June's popularity in Hawaii generate enough expectation he can fill the stadium with locals?


That's the key question and the answer is yes


SMU deep-pocket sellout guarantee, like SFA?
mr. pony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests