PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

OT: USC BBall punishes itself for violations - no postseason

Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

OT: USC BBall punishes itself for violations - no postseason

Postby Pony_Fan » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:52 am

USC has imposed sanctions on its men's basketball program for NCAA rules violations, including a ban on postseason competition at the end of this season, a reduction of scholarships and vacating all of its wins from 2007-08.

The university said the self-imposed sanctions resulted from an internal investigation that found NCAA rules violations related to O.J. Mayo, who played for the Trojans during the 2007-2008 season under former coach Tim Floyd. Mayo is now with the NBA's Memphis Grizzlies.

http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/n ... id=4792634
User avatar
Pony_Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6130
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Tx, USA

Re: OT: USC BBall punishes itself for violations - no postseason

Postby mr. pony » Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:54 am

Give 'em the DP!

(What would SMU have given itself in '87? Just wondering....) :)
mr. pony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm

Re: OT: USC BBall punishes itself for violations - no postseason

Postby PK » Mon Jan 04, 2010 12:08 pm

mr. pony wrote:Give 'em the DP!

(What would SMU have given itself in '87? Just wondering....) :)
A slap on the back and a "that a boy". 8)
SMU's first president, Robert S. Hyer, selected Harvard Crimson and Yale Blue as SMU's colors to symbolize SMU's high academic standards. We are one of the few Universities to have school colors with real meaning...and we just blow them off.
User avatar
PK
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 8805
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas 75206

Re: OT: USC BBall punishes itself for violations - no postseason

Postby smu diamond m » Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:37 pm

zing!
Sir, shooting-star, sir.
Frosh 2005 (TEN YEARS AGO!?!)
The original Heavy Metal.
User avatar
smu diamond m
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4951
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: High on the Hilltop

Re: OT: USC BBall punishes itself for violations - no postseason

Postby CalallenStang » Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:53 pm

mr. pony wrote:Give 'em the DP!

(What would SMU have given itself in '87? Just wondering....) :)


From Wikipedia:

On February 6, 1987, SMU's faculty athletics representative, religious studies professor Lonnie Kliever, delivered a report to the NCAA which recommended an extension of the school's probation an additional four years, until 1990. During this period, the school would only be allowed to hire six assistant coaches, and only four of them would be allowed to participate in off-campus recruiting. It also recommended that the school's ban from bowl games and live TV be extended until 1989. During those two seasons, SMU proposed dropping two nonconference games from its schedule. SMU's cooperation so impressed the enforcement staff that it recommended that the Infractions Committee accept SMU's proposed penalties, with the exception of a ban on nonconference play for two years.[8]
The committee, however, decided to take a different tack. On February 25, the committee unamimously voted to cancel SMU's 1987 football season, and voted only to allow it to play seven games (none at home) in 1988.[9]
The full list of penalties:
The 1987 season was canceled; only conditioning drills would be permitted during the 1987 calendar year.
All home games in 1988 were canceled. SMU was allowed to play their seven regularly scheduled away games so that other institutions would not be financially affected.
The team's existing probation was extended until 1990. Its existing ban from bowl games and live television was extended to 1989.
SMU lost 55 new scholarship positions over 4 years.
SMU was required to ensure that Owen and eight other boosters previously banned from contact with the program were in fact banned, or else face further punishment.
The team was only allowed to hire five full-time assistant coaches, instead of the typical nine.
No off-campus recruiting would be permitted until August 1988, and no paid visits could be made to campus by would-be recruits until the start of the 1988-89 school year.[10]
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: OT: USC BBall punishes itself for violations - no postseason

Postby mr. pony » Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:04 pm

CalallenStang wrote:
mr. pony wrote:Give 'em the DP!

(What would SMU have given itself in '87? Just wondering....) :)


From Wikipedia:

On February 6, 1987, SMU's faculty athletics representative, religious studies professor Lonnie Kliever, delivered a report to the NCAA which recommended an extension of the school's probation an additional four years, until 1990. During this period, the school would only be allowed to hire six assistant coaches, and only four of them would be allowed to participate in off-campus recruiting. It also recommended that the school's ban from bowl games and live TV be extended until 1989. During those two seasons, SMU proposed dropping two nonconference games from its schedule. SMU's cooperation so impressed the enforcement staff that it recommended that the Infractions Committee accept SMU's proposed penalties, with the exception of a ban on nonconference play for two years.[8]
The committee, however, decided to take a different tack. On February 25, the committee unamimously voted to cancel SMU's 1987 football season, and voted only to allow it to play seven games (none at home) in 1988.[9]
The full list of penalties:
The 1987 season was canceled; only conditioning drills would be permitted during the 1987 calendar year.
All home games in 1988 were canceled. SMU was allowed to play their seven regularly scheduled away games so that other institutions would not be financially affected.
The team's existing probation was extended until 1990. Its existing ban from bowl games and live television was extended to 1989.
SMU lost 55 new scholarship positions over 4 years.
SMU was required to ensure that Owen and eight other boosters previously banned from contact with the program were in fact banned, or else face further punishment.
The team was only allowed to hire five full-time assistant coaches, instead of the typical nine.
No off-campus recruiting would be permitted until August 1988, and no paid visits could be made to campus by would-be recruits until the start of the 1988-89 school year.[10]


Thanks. I hadn't seen SMU's recommendation before the hammer fell - or heard that we'd "so impressed" the enforcement staff with our "cooperation."

Anybody think USC's recommendations for its punishment won't be accepted as is by the NCAA?
mr. pony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm

Re: OT: USC BBall punishes itself for violations - no postseason

Postby NickSMU17 » Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:16 pm

Rumor has it they did this to themselves and the basketball team to save the football team
NickSMU17
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5668
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:01 am
Location: Hinsdale, IL


Return to Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 7 guests