Statesman: 2011 Down Year for Texas Talent

Discuss SMU recruiting in this forum.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
ALEX LIFESON
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11387
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:01 am
Location: GARLAND

Re: Statesman: 2011 Down Year for Texas Talent

Post by ALEX LIFESON »

Mexmustang wrote:Mr. Wonderful, now that we got global warming debunked, what did you mean about "birthers"? Never even heard the term in polite debate.


Stallion is probably not up from his Saturday night at Red River, but, "birthers" refers to those that questioned if Obama was born in the U.S.
User avatar
mathman
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1753
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:58 pm
Location: East Texas

Re: Statesman: 2011 Down Year for Texas Talent

Post by mathman »

d_pony wrote:here to date when global warming has been discussed it has been at a ministerial level - this time it was by the world leaders which indicates they are taking it seriously (whether you are or not) :D


http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/02/ ... scientist/
When will I start feeling stimulated??
Mexmustang
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2993
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Highland Park, Texas

Re: Statesman: 2011 Down Year for Texas Talent

Post by Mexmustang »

Then on Wednesday, Fox reports that one of the leading scientists on global warming comes out and refutes his own work--"15 years not a trend"..."his data wasn't handled properly etc.", "no scientific evidence that global warming is occuring". Sort of like my joking about about a single day's record snowfall in Dallas, refuting the whole Al Gore theory...
User avatar
PerunaPunch
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2686
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX, USA

Re: Statesman: 2011 Down Year for Texas Talent

Post by PerunaPunch »

d_pony wrote:as a :D er i hate to admit that Stallion is correct (although he usually is)

Please refer to signature line below dated December 25, 2007 11:38 pm

d_pony wrote:there is a reason why (for the first time in history) every major leader went to the Copenhagan conference to discuss global warming

I seriously hope you're being sarcastic. The answer to your query is why politician always congregate - it's called free booze and hookers.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/zei ... 82,00.html
"It's a couple hundred million dollars. I'm not losing sleep over it." -- David Miller
User avatar
PerunaPunch
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2686
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX, USA

Re: Statesman: 2011 Down Year for Texas Talent

Post by PerunaPunch »

mathman wrote:
d_pony wrote:as a :D er i hate to admit that Stallion is correct (although he usually is) - there is a reason why (for the first time in history) every major leader went to the Copenhagan conference to discuss global warming - there is a reason why there is a super 6 green conference made up of the US, China, India Brazil and South Africa (the countries who effect global warming the most) - get your heads out of the sand


I have heard some good arguments on both sides of the debate. However, what you just said is not one of them. So if Obama hadn't gone to the conference, which were his plans right up until a week before the conference...

Bummer. I guess MIchelle found out about the hookers. :(
"It's a couple hundred million dollars. I'm not losing sleep over it." -- David Miller
Post Reply