|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
Discuss SMU recruiting in this forum.
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by DallasDiehard » Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:19 am
According to the roster on SMUMustangs.com, there are 11 wide receivers coming back: Cole Beasley, Charles Clay, Bradley Haynes, Marcus Holyfield, Darius Johnson, Chayse Joubert, Cole Loftin, Deonte McDade, Aldrick Robinson, Ryan Walker, Terrance Wilkerson. In addition, SMU signed five in February: Ricky Collins, Kyle Guinyard, Jeremy Johnson, Keenan Holman and Arthur Londy. If, as has been suggested, Collins goes the JC route, that still means there are 15 receivers (plus walk-ons) coming to two-a-days in August.
It makes sense that receivers want to play in Coach Jones' offense, but he also has said (and shown) that he doesn't use a deep receiver rotation, that he prefers to basically run four guys until they can't go anymore.
So with all that said, how many WRs does SMU sign next February? Robinson and Wilkerson will be seniors in the fall, so there is a need, but I wonder if it will be limited to two or three this year.
Rise up, Mustang Nation!
Go SMU!
-

DallasDiehard

-
- Posts: 1837
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas
by Mexmustang » Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:42 am
First, I don't know, but I would bet that the situation is similar to the linebacker position. We will only take those cases where talent and potential is extremely high, perhaps exceptional, better than what we have successfully recruited in the past. The total number of positions available, probably depends upon how successful we are at recruiting other positions of need, like defensive tackle and offensive lineman. Then again, I would suggest that we should be considering how many we will have a year from now, when these 2011 recruits would be joining the program, rather than this fall. June always takes a number of receivers and we also to be missing some really tall receivers, many of our current receivers look like they came from the same mold. Like I said, I don't really know, but that's my guess.
Last edited by Mexmustang on Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:54 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
Mexmustang

-
- Posts: 2993
- Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Highland Park, Texas
by Alaric » Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:44 am
DallasDiehard wrote:According to the roster on SMUMustangs.com, there are 11 wide receivers coming back: Cole Beasley, Charles Clay, Bradley Haynes, Marcus Holyfield, Darius Johnson, Chayse Joubert, Cole Loftin, Deonte McDade, Aldrick Robinson, Ryan Walker, Terrance Wilkerson. In addition, SMU signed five in February: Ricky Collins, Kyle Guinyard, Jeremy Johnson, Keenan Holman and Arthur Londy. If, as has been suggested, Collins goes the JC route, that still means there are 15 receivers (plus walk-ons) coming to two-a-days in August.
It makes sense that receivers want to play in Coach Jones' offense, but he also has said (and shown) that he doesn't use a deep receiver rotation, that he prefers to basically run four guys until they can't go anymore.
So with all that said, how many WRs does SMU sign next February? Robinson and Wilkerson will be seniors in the fall, so there is a need, but I wonder if it will be limited to two or three this year.
The number goes down to 3 (very good) WRs in Feb 2011
-
Alaric

-
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:14 am
by The Q » Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:57 am
Until those young guys prove themselves, they can't really be counted on. I'm not saying they can't play, just that they haven't done it yet in games. In JJ's offense, I'd say receivers are like quarterbacks — can't have too many.
-

The Q

-
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by ALEX LIFESON » Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:10 am
Haynes is used only in TE-hback roles, Wilkerson will be a redshirt junior. At least a couple of the incoming freshmen, will redshirt or greyshirt.
-

ALEX LIFESON

-
- Posts: 11387
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: GARLAND
by The Q » Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:39 am
True, but JJ said at on Signing Day that he "underused" Haynes last year, and would like to use him more this season — presumably as a receiver, not just a blocker.
Plus, I bet at least one freshman DB recruit (Acker?) ends up on offense.
-

The Q

-
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by WildHorse » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:51 pm
I'd like to see Haynes have a bigger role next year. When he has had a chance, he makes plays. He's no longer just a tall guy ... that guy is really strong and runs well. I'd think he could be a major weapon.
Go PONIES!
-

WildHorse

-
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Arlington, Texas
by PerunaPunch » Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:27 pm
This is not an exaggeration... If you slapped a different jersey on Haynes you'd swear he was an NFL player. He's that big and strong. He was been described as a bigger Michael Irvin.
Not sure why he wasn't thrown to more often, other than the fact that there are only so many opportunities to pass around. I don't think I'd get much argument by declaring Sanders as our "possession receiver" last year. I think more of those kind of throws could go to Haynes next year with Robinson and Wilkerson continuing as the deep threats and Beasley and DJ doing a little of everything.
"It's a couple hundred million dollars. I'm not losing sleep over it." -- David Miller
-

PerunaPunch

-
- Posts: 2682
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Return to Recruiting
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
|
|