PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Stallion Question concerning TCU

Discuss SMU recruiting in this forum.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Stallion Question concerning TCU

Postby SoCal_Pony » Tue Aug 17, 2004 8:07 pm

Stallion, can you tell us how TCU’s recruiting has gone to date compared to prior years?

Realize it’s still early, but do you feel their move to Mountain West has been a positive or negative on recruiting?
User avatar
SoCal_Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am

Postby Charleston Pony » Tue Aug 17, 2004 8:11 pm

this site show 2 commitments. perhaps one of the recruiting gurus can tell us about these guys.

http://interact.ocsn.com/recruiting/sea ... &dbyear=04

should note that Houston has a bunch of early commitments. What about their list? Has last year's success revived that program?
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 28911
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Postby HFvictory » Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:04 pm

At UH, Briles has a lot of connections within the HS coaching ranks and it was expected that he would recruit well. How successfull he will be is yet to be seen, but UH has always seemed to recruit well. Briles inherited a talented team which seemed to under achieve. Don't know if his recruits are any better than what UH has had in the past, but he sure is getting kids to commit early.

TCU coaches encourage a lot of the early commits not to announce. They are not the big name recruits that get hounded by coaches, recruiting services and newspapers so there is usually less pressure to make the announcement.
HFvictory
All-American
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 3:01 am

Postby abezontar » Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:16 pm

probably a stupid question, but why would you not want kids to announce? Isn't the convential wisdom that the more kids you get to commit early on, the more likely that large group of commitments will encourage others to come, simply because so many others want to be there too?
The donkey's name is Kiki.

On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?

Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
User avatar
abezontar
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3888
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Mustang, TX

Postby Charleston Pony » Wed Aug 18, 2004 2:35 pm

not to mention the fact that a lot of coaches will back off a guy once they hear from him that he's committed somewhere. Won't keep them from calling to be sure a guy really is committed, but I don't see any advantage in trying to keep it quiet.
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 28911
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Postby Hoop Fan » Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:34 pm

There is a line of thinking that once a kid announces, the other coaches not only dont give up, they go after the guy with more pressure tactics and negatives about the school he committed to. As for committments breeding committments, thats true, but some coaches probably feel they can communicate the specific commitments they have directly to the recruits they want to impress. They dont need the recruiting services to do that.
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Postby HFvictory » Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:58 pm

Exactly...coaches don't back off. The recruits know what is going on and many discuss their commitments with fellow recruits even if not announced. Early announcements seem to only get fans excited and have little effect on the final class.
HFvictory
All-American
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 3:01 am

Postby SWC2010 » Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:09 pm

I would say Chris Hall is a perfect example of "Recruiters Gone Wild" after he committed to us. everybody else turned up the heat....
SWC2010
Heisman
 
Posts: 1220
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: TEXAS

Postby HFvictory » Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:46 pm

Hated to see that happen. One thing about announcing early is that the recruiters know exactly who the competition is and they can focus on areas that their program may excel over the recruits choice...BCS vs. non-BCS, Big XII vs. WAC or C-USA, attendance, etc., etc.

Every program has an advantage over another program and there is no reason to let the recruiters know exactly who they are going up against. There are several recruits who have stated on Rivals interviews that they are keeping their favorite a secret (some have TCU listed as a possibility).
HFvictory
All-American
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 3:01 am

Postby Roach » Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:56 pm

Why tcu would be anyone's favorite is beyond me. To each his own, I guess.
User avatar
Roach
Heisman
 
Posts: 1173
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Dallas

Re:

Postby HFvictory » Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:26 pm

Roach wrote:Why tcu would be anyone's favorite is beyond me. To each his own, I guess.


Why don't you win a game first, talk trash later....

I am not a huge SMU fan but enjoy football. I would love it if both SMU and TCU went 11-2 or better every year and had a great battle on the field. SMU plays TCU tough, especially last year, but don't expect to run with them this year....

TCU players had 21 major surgeries last year and still finished in the top 25 after losing their #1 RB and #1 QB as well as many of there DBs. They are healthy so far this year.

Just trying to answer some questions here without talking anybody down, but I could just as soon not....
HFvictory
All-American
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 3:01 am

Re:

Postby SWC2010 » Wed Aug 18, 2004 11:02 pm

HFvictory wrote:
Roach wrote:Why tcu would be anyone's favorite is beyond me. To each his own, I guess.


Why don't you win a game first, talk trash later....

I am not a huge SMU fan but enjoy football. I would love it if both SMU and TCU went 11-2 or better every year and had a great battle on the field. SMU plays TCU tough, especially last year, but don't expect to run with them this year....

TCU players had 21 major surgeries last year and still finished in the top 25 after losing their #1 RB and #1 QB as well as many of there DBs. They are healthy so far this year.

Just trying to answer some questions here without talking anybody down, but I could just as soon not....


Let me get this straight "HF"...

TCU 10-0, gives up 40 points & loses C-USA to So Miss on Nat'l TV;

then, TCU sweats out a 20-13 victory against a freshman laden SMU team;

In their final game, TCU loses it's own home bowl game to Boise St...

Hmmmmmmmmmmm
SWC2010
Heisman
 
Posts: 1220
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: TEXAS

Re:

Postby HFvictory » Thu Aug 19, 2004 9:37 am

Let me get this straight "HF"...

TCU 10-0, gives up 40 points & loses C-USA to So Miss on Nat'l TV;

then, TCU sweats out a 20-13 victory against a freshman laden SMU team;

In their final game, TCU loses it's own home bowl game to Boise St...

Hmmmmmmmmmmm


Hmmmmm, why don't you review your past season......
HFvictory
All-American
 
Posts: 739
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 3:01 am

Postby EP Pony Fan » Thu Aug 19, 2004 9:58 am

Far be it from me to defend TCU (as an SMU alum, I can't do that in good conscience!), but let's be fair - losing to Boise State is not a disgrace - the Broncos are a damn good team.
User avatar
EP Pony Fan
Varsity
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2002 3:01 am
Location: El Paso

Postby Mike Damone » Thu Aug 19, 2004 10:04 am

Ripping on TCU's two loss season. Pathetic. In your post you include three phrases I'd give anything to see at SMU: "10-0", "national television", and "bowl game."

Regardless, anyone else find it funny that the only person not to post on this thread is the one in the subject.
Mike Damone
All-American
 
Posts: 642
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Dallas

Next

Return to Recruiting

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests