PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

2005 class priorities

Discuss SMU recruiting in this forum.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

2005 class priorities

Postby PonyTales » Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:21 pm

In addition to the seniors who will graduate this year, we have scholarships available that previously were allotted to Ricky Joe Meeks, Ervin McGee, C.D. Moss, Grant Eidson, and a few others. I've heard that we might even have a full class of scholarships in February. On the conservative side, let's say we have 20 to offer. With the departure of Eidson, Neal and Hargis, offensive line has to be priority No. 1, right? If I'm the coach (and you all can be thankful I'm not), here's how I'd like to see the breakdown:

OL: 5
DL: 4
LB: 3
S: 3
CB: 2
RB: 1
WR: 1
QB: 1

Only fluctuation there would be maybe another WR, in place of .... one of the S's? Anything I'm forgetting?
User avatar
PonyTales
Heisman
 
Posts: 1283
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Garland, Texas

Postby Thumper » Wed Sep 01, 2004 9:59 am

I would agree with that list for the most part. On the defensive line, I think we need to focus on DEs. Yes, we're losing Allan Adami inside, but there's some talent there - Jones, Bonds, Mouton, DeLay, Denman, Karrington. We're a little light already at DE, and with Melvin Williams graduating, the loss of the Horton kid and the note I saw about Jamar Bey moving back to OLB, that just thins the ranks even more. (Although I really like the idea someone posted about bulking up Andrew McKinney and making him a big, FAST defensive end.)

And with Foy Munlin graduating and the other RBs unproven, maybe another RB for that list?
User avatar
Thumper
Varsity
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Tyler, Texas

Postby BUS » Wed Sep 01, 2004 11:12 am

Just because a kid is recruited as playing a position in High School does not mean that is his position at SMU. I would like to see a couple more guys at DL. But get this..... Maybe a little lighter than normal and quicker. They can harden up with Faucette and become NICE LB's.

I knew a man that went to TT as a fullback, moved to O-tackle and then played 5 years for Da Bears. It happens all the time.

Secondly, I think you always take one QB and one running back.
Mustang Militia: Fight the good fight"
User avatar
BUS
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Richardson, Tx usa

Postby giacfsp » Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:02 pm

Your reference to the guy at Tech sounds a lot like Jerry Ball - FB-to-DT.

I'd like to see an extra LB on that list, and I'd like to see more depth in the secondary with multiple cornerbacks and safeties. Coach Bennett's defensive philosophy thrives when he has superior DBs who he and Coach Gush can rotate in and out.
User avatar
giacfsp
Heisman
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas

Postby JasonB » Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:22 pm

Here is my list of 20, given the current roster:

QB: 1
RB: 1
WR: 3
TE: 1
OG: 2
C: 2
DE: 2
MLB: 1
OLB: 2
FS: 1
SS: 1
K: 1
P: 1
CB: 1


Additional scholarships will be used to pick up Offensive Tackle, More Corners, and more OLB.

This will move us towards 3 deep at every spot.

Kicker and Punter will be necessary because both are juniors this year, and you don't want true frosh to start there. The only guy we have on scholarship is Wolcott, who does not have a strong leg.
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7226
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Postby Mike Damone » Wed Sep 01, 2004 2:27 pm

We 100%, absolutely, MUST get a quarterback in this class.
The attitude dictates that you don't care whether she comes, stays, lays, or prays. I mean whatever happens, your toes are still tappin'. Now when you got that, then you have the attitude.

-Me
Mike Damone
All-American
 
Posts: 642
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Dallas

Postby Pony4Life » Wed Sep 01, 2004 4:39 pm

I see the logic in your list, except I'd like to see at least 2 offensive tackles, because of the lack of depth behind Johnson and Urbanus.
User avatar
Pony4Life
Heisman
 
Posts: 1396
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
Location: University Park, Texas

Postby JasonB » Wed Sep 01, 2004 5:07 pm

By my count, we have DJ, Urbanus, Lobo, Poynter, Burley, Morton at DT. ALl underclassmen. It is not a position of need yet. Center is the most pressing need on the OL, and then guard.
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7226
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Postby Stallion » Wed Sep 01, 2004 6:22 pm

.....I seriously don't think that SMU is in position to turn down quality recruits at a single position. Now if we are talking about pickin' n' choosen' at a lower level of recruit then prorities may come into play. I think-and believe that it will become quite obvious in the next few weeks-that SMU really needs to address the receiver position. I think we got one and a whole lot of maybes.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Postby Mike Damone » Wed Sep 01, 2004 6:53 pm

JasonB-

Not that I would be against signing one or two more, but isn't Mitch Enright a center, or at least projected as one in college?
The attitude dictates that you don't care whether she comes, stays, lays, or prays. I mean whatever happens, your toes are still tappin'. Now when you got that, then you have the attitude.

-Me
Mike Damone
All-American
 
Posts: 642
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Dallas

Re:

Postby Pony Up » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:39 am

JasonB wrote:By my count, we have DJ, Urbanus, Lobo, Poynter, Burley, Morton at DT. ALl underclassmen. It is not a position of need yet. Center is the most pressing need on the OL, and then guard.
Lobo is a true freshman and sounds like a good prospect, but is nobody's a sure thing. Poynter is being asked to play every OL position, which doesn't allow the time to perfect any single spot - which is vital at OT, especially if he's protecting the QB's blind side. Burley is a monster but still very raw. Morton's a third-year sophomore who not only hasn't played (maybe at all), he hasn't even earned a letter for contributing significantly. With all due respect, I'm not sure I want a guy with that résumé responsible for keeping Phillips alive and upright.

Translation: we need to sign at least 5 OLs.
User avatar
Pony Up
All-American
 
Posts: 978
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Waco, Texas

Postby Pony Up » Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:40 am

And yes, Damone, the PF.com write-up on Enright said he's expecting to play center.
User avatar
Pony Up
All-American
 
Posts: 978
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Waco, Texas

Re:

Postby DallasDiehard » Wed Sep 29, 2004 8:11 pm

BUS wrote: .... I would like to see a couple more guys at DL. But get this..... Maybe a little lighter than normal and quicker. They can harden up with Faucette and become NICE LB's....

You're on to something there, BUS. Stay tuned.
Rise up, Mustang Nation!
Go SMU!
User avatar
DallasDiehard
Heisman
 
Posts: 1836
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas

Postby Dark Horse » Mon Oct 04, 2004 11:06 am

The DMN said that the defensive line isn't exactly drawing rave reviews. With that in mind (and if we do get to offer a full class):

OL (still the top priority): 7 (David Allison, Mitch Enright, Josh Hickman plus four more)
DE: 2
DT: 2
WR: 3
LB: 3 (Todd Alexander plus two more)
QB: 1
RB: 1
S: 3 (Rivals seems to think Carl Sims of Corsicana is a possibility)
CB: 2
TE: 1
User avatar
Dark Horse
All-American
 
Posts: 760
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Plano, Texas

Postby GoRedGoBlue » Tue Oct 05, 2004 12:05 pm

Better get two 6'3"+, 4.4 WR, one FRESH, one JUCO, or this offense won't do much going forward.

2005 is our competitive year, 2006 is our best shot as a team - but we need WRs
GoRedGoBlue
Heisman
 
Posts: 1527
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 3:01 am
Location: dallas,tx,usa

Next

Return to Recruiting

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 
cron