Do recruiting critics want it both ways?

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:33 pm

Get your head out of your [deleted]. You want me to compare Texas offers between Texas Tech and SMU right now

Wuba · Post by **Wuba** » Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:36 pm

Stallion wrote:IGNORE^

2012 Tech Commitments:
Cunbie 2 1/2
Moore 1
McElroy 1
Mainored 1
Mounds 1
Brown 1/2

Shows that Tech has 7 commits from 6 different coaches. With the max for a single coach being 2.5.

SMU has 6 2012 commitments from 5 different coaches, with Hill having the most with 2.

I am surprised to see that so far in 2012 SMU and Tech have seen their commitments similarly distributed across their coaching staffs.

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:38 pm

Stallion wrote:Get your head out of your [deleted]. You want me to compare Texas offers between Texas Tech and SMU right now

No, I'm content with you showing your [deleted] on the recruiting imbalance thing for now. I'll hand you your head on the quality of recruits later.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:55 pm

Texas Tech has managed 31 Out of State Offers and yet was not Late to the Party in Texas:

March 17, 2011
Tech 42
SMU 9

April 26, 2011
Tech 47
SMU 12

May 17, 2011
Tech 48
SMU 18

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:01 pm

Not the subject, Kemosabe.

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:29 pm

^ IGNORE

Do recruiting critics want it both ways?

Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?

Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?

Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?

Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?

Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?

Re: Do recruiting critics want it both ways?