FroggieFever wrote:It's was the first game against a top 10 team. Let's reserve judgement until, say, mid season.
Where do you get off bringing logic into this alcohol-fueled diatribe?
|
The hard questionModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
22 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: The hard question
Where do you get off bringing logic into this alcohol-fueled diatribe?
Re: The hard questionshouldn't a Run and shoot team be able to throw downfield??
Re: The hard question
Yes but that's not our problem since we're clearly not a Run and Shoot team. They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
-Benjamin Franklin
Re: The hard questionThis is more than the run and shoot. THere is the very real possibility that we have a 3rd straight year of 1000+ yard runner. That is a dimension we haven't had in a while.
To be honest, A$M had some very good athletes on defense in all positions. We will not face that level of athleticism across an entire defense again. I would bet very few teams have a 100+ yard rusher against a$m this year. We did have some receivers make some great catches. With less responsive athletes in the future facing our receivers, we perform better. And had Padron hit our receiver in stride on that second pick, he would have still been decleated and possible drop the ball.
Re: The hard question
I blame it on sobriety. Throw me a beer. Go Frogs! Pony Up!
The hard question
Anyone on the board with coaching experience who can tell us WHY? "I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
Re: The hard questionThree pages in and still haven't answered the question. A fair one, IMO.
22 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests |
|