PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Reality Check # 2 - No Offense

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Reality Check # 2 - No Offense

Postby Pony in SA » Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:45 am

This team was 7 and 7 last year with a more favorable schedule and lost a home bowl game to Army. That's right Army at home (not LSU, TCU, etc.), where they only scored 14 points after a month or so to prepare. In addition they lost to Houston badly at home when they had a chance to cement their West division lead, then when another chance to secure conference went out to UTEP and lost to an average at best UTEP team. Don't even get me started about Navy. Also, only 7 points in conference championship game.

I have come to have no expectations as this group appears to be very up and down. By now with the experience we have our offense should play better. Sure A & M is more talented, but the reality is Jones is supposed to be an offensive coach and we have underperformed for awhile on offense and can not score any points. I do not know if it is the QBs, WRs, OLine, etc. but we are paying Jones alot to figure this out and so far he hasn't. Reality is our offense has to play better and has been one of the weak spots.
Pony in SA
All-American
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 9:44 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: Reality Check # 2 - No Offense

Postby NomAnor » Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:07 am

To be fair they did move the ball very well in the first half just couldnt punch it in.We were just out maned in the end and got wore out in the second half .
User avatar
NomAnor
Heisman
 
Posts: 1245
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 12:42 pm
Location: I have no idea where I am

Re: Reality Check # 2 - No Offense

Postby LakeHighlandsPony » Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:31 am

Without Zach Line we have no offense. Our passing game is awful!
User avatar
LakeHighlandsPony
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2558
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:50 am
Location: The Boneyard

Re: Reality Check # 2 - No Offense

Postby rooster » Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:45 am

As soon as Padron got pulled, confidence dropped and we could never recover.
rooster
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 12:02 pm

Re: Reality Check # 2 - No Offense

Postby Stallion » Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:52 am

Very little downfield passing attack. Most passes were caught 3-5 yards downfield and SMU's receivers weren't physical enough to get off the line or run for much YAK. That was the big mismatch coming in. SMU's diminitive receivers against A&M's more physical BCS DBs especially their CBs. SMU got some yards and made some completions that padded stats but really were ineffectual. Not going to be too negative about the lack of a deep threat because of wind conditions but the Passing Game will struggle against better competition unless a deep threat is found. No Deep Threat t means more DBs in the intermediate passing zone-more interceptions and less big plays.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: Reality Check # 2 - No Offense

Postby davidpaul123 » Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:21 am

Our recievers definately had a hard time getting open which originally was the reason I thought Padron struggled early on. In watching the replay though there were throws to be made although most of what was open were the underneath stuff. Kyle seemed to be focused more on the downfield stuff and finally got a guy open down the field but overthrew him for his 2nd interception. First interception he had 2 guys open and picked the guy with the tightest coverage, not a good decision.

JJ came in and made the underneath throws which were just beyond the line of scrimage and let the guys run picking up 6-7 yds a throw.

Both guys had some time to throw which was good. Looking forward to seeing how the passing game looks next week, hope its improved a whole bunch.
Image
User avatar
davidpaul123
Heisman
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Reality Check # 2 - No Offense

Postby CalallenStang » Mon Sep 05, 2011 9:28 am

rooster wrote:As soon as Padron got pulled, confidence dropped and we could never recover.


Were you watching the same game I was? I saw the offense continue to roll until we had to finally punt. After we punted, we didn't do anything for the rest of the night.
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: Reality Check # 2 - No Offense

Postby Pony_Law » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:51 am

I think the real problem with the offense is that it is never clicking on all cylenders. What I mean by that is 1) if the line gives time the WR are covered 2) if the WR are open the line doesn't block 3) if the line blocks and the WR are open we have an inaccurate throw (either incomplete/intercepted/or have to make a spactacular catch killing any yac possibility. I've only seen one game where the line blocks the receivers are open and hit in stride with a accurate ball from the QB (hawii bowl). Maybe we will get that against lesser CUSA opponents but we will see.
Pony_Law
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2873
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:07 pm

Re: Reality Check # 2 - No Offense

Postby SMU 86 » Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:56 am

Pony_Law wrote:I think the real problem with the offense is that it is never clicking on all cylenders. What I mean by that is 1) if the line gives time the WR are covered 2) if the WR are open the line doesn't block 3) if the line blocks and the WR are open we have an inaccurate throw (either incomplete/intercepted/or have to make a spactacular catch killing any yac possibility. I've only seen one game where the line blocks the receivers are open and hit in stride with a accurate ball from the QB (hawii bowl). Maybe we will get that against lesser CUSA opponents but we will see.


Well, I really have a hard time arguing with that.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown

________________________Champion________________________
Image
User avatar
SMU 86
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12943
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:41 pm


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dukie, Google [Bot] and 5 guests