|
2011 Non-QualifiersModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
2011 Non-QualifiersSo does anyone know if we lost all of our non-qualifiers? HTat could be the reason we have went after so many LBs in the 2012 class
Re: 2011 Non-Qualifiersnot a member and dont want details, just a yes or no answer
Re: 2011 Non-QualifiersGet a membership. Then you get answers, details, and you help the program. Win-win.
Re: 2011 Non-QualifiersI did not know having a membership would help SMU financially. Is that true
Re: 2011 Non-Qualifiers
Excuse the ignorance, how does signing up for rivals help the program?
Re: 2011 Non-QualifiersNo question having a rivals site helps SMU. The publishers/reporters can talk to recruits and gauge interest when coaches can't. Takes $ to have a publisher/reporter
Re: 2011 Non-Qualifiersdon't support them and they'll go away...support them and you get more info, more coverage
Re: 2011 Non-QualifiersHow many times are people going to ask the same question? This has been discussed and answered almost on a weekly basis it seems.
Re: 2011 Non-QualifiersMore? Yeah, right ... as long as you don't want anything of value covering the actual team. They do a spiffy job of calling endless recruits, of whom a small fraction ends up at SMU. For actual coverage of the Ponies, you're on the only site you need right now.
Re: 2011 Non-QualifiersThe sites compliment one another nicely, and no one is trying to take shots at Ponyfans...it's outstanding, wonderful, free, and great. Rivals and Scout fill other goals and objectives. The stronger all three of them are, the better it is for the program. Don't be ignorant in thinking this is some zero-sum game.
Re: 2011 Non-Qualifiers
You are wise. I love it here, but if people are to support one, it has to be the one that matters in recruiting. Ponyfans is a great site, but the other is a service w/a legitimate database.
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests |
|