PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Mark This Day

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: Mark This Day

Postby HB Pony Dad » Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:55 pm

lwjr wrote:
ericdickerson4life wrote:Got it marked. 10/6/2011

Kind of like the day the music died.


Bye, Bye......


... miss American Pie
Drove my Chevy to the levee but the levee was dry
And good ol’ boys were drinking whisky and rye?
Singing this will be the day that I die
this will be the day that I die


Sorta like all the Apple Fan Boys! :(
SMU - IT'S YOUR TURN

FIRE JUNE JONES

Image
USC Trojan for Life and SMU Dad!
User avatar
HB Pony Dad
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3950
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:35 pm
Location: Huntington Beach, California

Re: Mark This Day

Postby Pony Fan » Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:11 pm

jtstang wrote:Sorry but TCU will compete in the Big 12 and compete strongly.


They will never compete with OU, Texas or Oklahoma State, just like we wouldn't.
User avatar
Pony Fan
Heisman
 
Posts: 1595
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA

Re: Mark This Day

Postby ericdickerson4life » Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:15 pm

Pony Fan wrote:
jtstang wrote:They will never compete with OU, Texas or Oklahoma State, just like we wouldn't.

If that's the case then why would we want to join them in a major conference like the B12? I like football for the competition. I want to win and I want my teams to be competitive against whomever is in their conference. If we can't be competitive with the top teams in our conference then we might as well move somewhere where we can compete.
User avatar
ericdickerson4life
Heisman
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 9:48 am

Re: Mark This Day

Postby sbsmith » Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:18 pm

ericdickerson4life wrote:
Pony Fan wrote:
jtstang wrote:They will never compete with OU, Texas or Oklahoma State, just like we wouldn't.

If that's the case then why would we want to join them in a major conference like the B12? I like football for the competition. I want to win and I want my teams to be competitive against whomever is in their conference. If we can't be competitive with the top teams in our conference then we might as well move somewhere where we can compete.



For the money and exposure of course.
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security

-Benjamin Franklin
sbsmith
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 9540
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:21 am
Location: Dallas

Re: Mark This Day

Postby ericdickerson4life » Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:21 pm

Ah, so this is all about SMU making more money. Not about winning anything meaningful. Gotcha. If that is truly the case. If that is the real reasons behind a move up. Count me out. I guess I'll have to turn all my attention to the real amateur athletics high school football and Olympic gymnastics.
User avatar
ericdickerson4life
Heisman
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 9:48 am

Re: Mark This Day

Postby LongLivePeruna » Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:28 pm

Oct. 6th...more like the day the dream of SMU returning to relelvance died. Sad sad day. Leaving an irrelevant Conference USA to go to a nothing Big East does nothing for us.
User avatar
LongLivePeruna
Newbie
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 10:56 am

Re: Mark This Day

Postby ericdickerson4life » Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:32 pm

LongLivePeruna wrote:Oct. 6th...more like the day the dream of SMU returning to relelvance died. Sad sad day. Leaving an irrelevant Conference USA to go to a nothing Big East does nothing for us.

If we go to the BE it is a big deal. As others have stated the BE will hold onto its BCS AQ status through 2014. That gives us 3 season to compete outright for a BCS bowl. 3 seasons to reap the financial reward of the BE TV contract (and when you include BB its not bad). 3 seasons to gain greater national relevance. It does a lot for us.
User avatar
ericdickerson4life
Heisman
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 9:48 am

Re: Mark This Day

Postby redpony » Thu Oct 06, 2011 2:39 pm

ed4l- What you say may be true however our chances of being invited to the BE just dropped very substantially with the froggies going b12-x.

GO PONIES!!!
redpony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 10968
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:44 am
Location: on the beach,northern Peru

Re: Mark This Day

Postby EastStang » Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:42 pm

I'm not so sure that it hurts us. It allows them to go after SMU and perhaps Rice or UH. Rice? Well remember, the Catholic schools are driving this bus and academics is something they think about (although Cincy is in that conference and we all know that they had a 0 grad rate a couple of times).
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12690
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: Mark This Day

Postby birddogger » Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:50 pm

SMU is a logical substitute for TCU in the BE. But that doesn't mean we belong there.
User avatar
birddogger
All-American
 
Posts: 552
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:24 pm

Re: Mark This Day

Postby ericdickerson4life » Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:10 am

It's only dead if UT and to a less extent OU decide it's dead. Otherwise it will live forever.
User avatar
ericdickerson4life
Heisman
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 9:48 am

Re: Mark This Day

Postby Topper » Fri Oct 07, 2011 12:51 pm

TCU's recruiting profile has been enhanced significantly. I don't know if they will regularly compete on the level of a UT or an OU, but they will definitely have an advantage over us until we find a BCS conference.
User avatar
Topper
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:01 am
Location: 19th Hole

Re: Mark This Day

Postby goldenstang » Fri Oct 07, 2011 12:55 pm

We don't get anyone that TCU wants as it is. They recruit in Texas we don't even know where that is.
User avatar
goldenstang
Heisman
 
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:45 am

Re: Mark This Day

Postby Moose » Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:15 pm

goldenstang wrote:We don't get anyone that TCU wants as it is. They recruit in Texas we don't even know where that is.


In Texas recruiting, we are behind a long list including UT, OU, LSU, Baylor, A&M, TCU.....

All but TCU and Baylor have been on that list since before we spoke English in Texas. We got a little too fixated on taking recruits away from UT and A&M in the late 70's and we all know where that got us eventually. Our strength is is recruiting out west now and that seems to be paying off. We also did quite well with a certain recruit from Michigan. June is a good national recruiter and, based on where our program is, we are doing quite well.
I'm the guy blocking your view on 3rd down and making your ears hurt.
User avatar
Moose
Junior Varsity
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:55 pm

Re: Mark This Day

Postby Topper » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:03 pm

I have no issue with the great improvement in the quality of our recruits. But it is ridiculous if we dont work to be competitive with everyone else for top talent in our own back yard. I would like to see long term trust and relationships between our athletic department and the local high school coaches.
User avatar
Topper
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 3:01 am
Location: 19th Hole

PreviousNext

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests