Is CUSA a better choice if UL and/or WVU leave?

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

SMUstang
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1240
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Horseshoe Bay, TX, USA
Contact:

Re: Is CUSA a better choice if UL and/or WVU leave?

Post by SMUstang »

I really hope you are right.
User avatar
mustangxc
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7339
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm

Re: Is CUSA a better choice if UL and/or WVU leave?

Post by mustangxc »

Also, if money doesn't matter then why did we drop the men's cross-country and track teams, which were by far the most successful in the school when they were dissolved?
User avatar
ericdickerson4life
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 9:48 am

Re: Is CUSA a better choice if UL and/or WVU leave?

Post by ericdickerson4life »

SMUstang wrote:I really hope you are right.

Why? Even if the "wrong" move is to go the BE only to find it not around in a year or two we are right back where we are today. There is no benefit in staying in CUSA. None.
User avatar
goldenstang
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:45 am

Re: Is CUSA a better choice if UL and/or WVU leave?

Post by goldenstang »

SMUstang wrote:
smupony94 wrote:1.5 million in CUSA
25 million in Big East even if for 2 years


You're forgetting the exit fee for CUSA. And we probably couldn't join the BE until 2013. Would we still get 25 million? Not to mention higher travel costs and the loss of long time rivals Rice, Tulane, and Tulsa.


We've played Missouri and North Texas more times than we have played Tulsa and Tulane. I think Tulsa is a great program and I have a lot of respect for them. Tulane and Rice have all but given up trying to compete in football. I would like to play rice in OOC but I couldn't care less about playing Tulane again.
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 29068
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Re: Is CUSA a better choice if UL and/or WVU leave?

Post by Charleston Pony »

Tulsa and Tulane are good future non-conference games...in both football and bball
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Is CUSA a better choice if UL and/or WVU leave?

Post by gostangs »

you say losing Rice, Tulane and Tulsa like that would be a bad thing. I think it is waaay at the top of the benefits. Those games are not fun - and they never have been.

If money doesnt matter why dont you go ahead and write the 5 M check to have us break even every year from our monetary losses in athletics? Go ahead - its not big deal. Just money. Didnt think so.

Someone has to cover that loss - and you cant keep going back to that well every year. That is why Tulane and Rice (and probably Tulsa) will not stay up with the pack and stay D-1 football within a few years. they cant keep putting in the cost of poker when they lose every hand.

as of 2013 there will be no loss to worry about. That is a very big deal for SMU - we can suddenly start investing in other things - IPF's, natatoreums, mens track/baseball etc...are all on the table in a few years with this move. It is HUGE and not even worth 2 seconds of questioning.
User avatar
SMU2007
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5561
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:41 am

Re: Is CUSA a better choice if UL and/or WVU leave?

Post by SMU2007 »

No this is a great question.

Good follow up question: should we get rid of JJ and Adrian Klemm?
Post Reply