Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

LHS81 · Post by **LHS81** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:01 pm

Does this mean SMU will be the 15th team in the SEC?

fan · Post by **fan** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:03 pm

When Mizzou leaves, the Big 12 has very limited options if the Big East is really going to stick with the 27 month exit clause. It'll be BYU to get to 10 and then done. Louisville and West Virginia couldn't get into the Big 12 until the 2015 football season but the Big 12 needs to get to 10 right away so that they can keep their TV contract in place.

huskerpony · Post by **huskerpony** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:05 pm

fan wrote:When Mizzou leaves, the Big 12 has very limited options if the Big East is really going to stick with the 27 month exit clause. It'll be BYU to get to 10 and then done. Louisville and West Virginia couldn't get into the Big 12 until the 2015 football season but the Big 12 needs to get to 10 right away so that they can keep their TV contract in place.

That is a very good point.

NickSMU17 · Post by **NickSMU17** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:05 pm

Good Comment by fan....

ponyinNC · Post by **ponyinNC** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:06 pm

hello BYU, SMU and UH to the new Big 12...? Just kidding

MustangSTATS · Post by **MustangSTATS** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:11 pm

How watered down does the Big12 get before Texas again tries to flee for the PAC12?

TCU is going to be in for a ride. Will Big12 money be that much more than BE once contracts are renegotiated with Mizz and A&M missing? The schools they are adding are now where near comparable in numbers. They should just add BYU and lock in their teams. BYU has no where else to go, PAC12 and Big10 are not taking them. For BYU it's indy or Big12, unless BE wants to add another FB only team. WVU is the only other high value team left for them to try and get and WVU is a stretch distance wise and burns couches for fun.

BE teams flirting with the Big12 should wake up and see what a mess/house of cards it is and sign to stay in the BE.

HB Pony Dad · Post by **HB Pony Dad** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:12 pm

ponyinNC wrote:hello BYU, SMU and UH to the new Big 12...? Just kidding

Why Not!

Oh forgot the LDS do not play on The Lord's Day!

SMUstang · Post by **SMUstang** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:15 pm

I wonder how much it would cost the Big 12 in TV revenue money to have to play with 9 teams for 2 or 3 years? TCU, do you know?

LHS81 · Post by **LHS81** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:21 pm

I just hope that SMU doesn't follow TCwho's lead, and jump from bed to bed to become an AQ team.

ponyinNC · Post by **ponyinNC** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:26 pm

LHS81 wrote:I just hope that SMU doesn't follow TCwho's lead, and jump from bed to bed to become an AQ team.

i hope we become just as slutty as TCU if it gets us a seat at the table! :lol:

Mustang75 · Post by **Mustang75** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:33 pm

Am I missing something on today's front page?

http://missouri.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1282269

ponyinNC · Post by **ponyinNC** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:36 pm

Mustang75 wrote:Am I missing something on today's front page?

http://missouri.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1282269

yes, in the article it states that giving Deaton the power is basically the first step to SEC. TAMU did the same thing, if you recall.

MustangSTATS · Post by **MustangSTATS** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:38 pm

How this move is seen by ponyfans hopefuls:
SEC to Mizzou, you said you wanted to be in the Big10 and we don't settle for being second choice, we are the premier football conference of D1, good luck with that phone call... Hey SMU, we need a Vandy of the West and we also hate TCU...

mrydel · Post by **mrydel** » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:41 pm

Curious as to why they would want a Vandy of the west when they do not want the Vandy of the east they have now.

PK · Post by PK » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:46 pm

mrydel wrote:Curious as to why they would want a Vandy of the west when they do not want the Vandy of the east they have now.

This is a message board...what do you expect. :wink:

Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone

Re: Rivals Mizzou site says they are gone