mrydel wrote:I wonder where the document "obtained by the Globe" came from? Probably the author's kid. "Look daddy. I tooken many teams and mushed dem all together. Isn't their colors pretty?"
westexSMU wrote:Forget the Big Money we were going to get from the Big East. This would s-u-c-k. Why do this now ? The Big East would not loose their BCS status anyway for a few more years if ever. They can always do this deal with the MWC and CUSA anytime in the future if need be . So why talk about it now ?
Agreed. All this does is dilute the money. Why would Rutgers & UConn want to dilute their brand. At least for two years you get the TV money. Then if it all implodes, go to a massive conference.
CoxMustangFan wrote:The MWC and CUSA conferences have clearly been the ugly girlfriends that scream "I'm pregnant" as the good teams are walking out the door. And you guys thought that SMU wouldn't get the death penalty twice!!
blauds mark blaudschun Big East not biting on Super Conf plan proposed by MWC/C-USA faction, but a study of BCS AQ data shows Big East should be worried
I don't have him on Twitter, found this posted on the CUSA board