Have you seen my baseball?

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
whitwiki
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1497
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:22 pm

Re: Re: Have you seen my baseball?

Post by whitwiki »

smubrooks wrote:Title 9 is awesome. Equestrian has like 40 scholarships and only 3-4 girls compete per horse show. Seems like a lot of money well spent if you ask me! I mean, that "sport" alone generates a ton of revenue!!!


I'm not arguing for equestrian. I just don't like baseball and I'm not convinced its worth it.

I'm not going to campaign against it or anything geez.
redpony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 10968
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:44 am
Location: on the beach,northern Peru

Re: Have you seen my baseball?

Post by redpony »

I'm sure the baseball stadium is on the list- about 20 places below the IPF (which might happen in the next 10 years). :evil:

GO PONIES!!!
User avatar
whitwiki
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1497
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:22 pm

Re: Have you seen my baseball?

Post by whitwiki »

Maybe what I really mean to say is this:

I have a lot of pride in SMU. I really want us to excel in everything - academics, sports, whatever.

For sports, I feel like we have quite a bit of work to do in the marquee sports (and some other sports). In my mind, opening up two new sports (baseball + women's something) will further distract our resources from achieving success. Therefore, I'm not a fan of adding a sport just for the sake of adding a sport, until we can demonstrate an ability to compete (elsewhere) and support "new projects."

And honestly, any arguments of "if XYZ wants to give money for ABC, then why not" also applies to another Museum on campus. So that line of thinking (whether true or not) leads down a dangerous road.



That said, if you guys want baseball @ SMU, I'm not going to get mad (...publicly :wink: ). I just have no interest in it.



I'm going back to derailing threads.
Post Reply