SMU QBs have thrown 24 INTs and and lost 8 other fumbles (17 total fumbles)
SMU has collected 4 INTs and recovered 9 of 22 opponent fumbles.
You just really can't be a consistent football team doing that. We were -9 last year?
Turnover ratio through 10 games -- (- 11)
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2612
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:09 pm
Re: Turnover ratio through 10 games -- (- 11)
Mitch McConnell wrote:SMU QBs have thrown 24 INTs and and lost 8 other fumbles (17 total fumbles)
SMU has collected 4 INTs and recovered 9 of 22 opponent fumbles.
You just really can't be a consistent football team doing that. We were -9 last year?
SMU QBs have thrown 16 INTs not 24.
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
-Benjamin Franklin
-Benjamin Franklin
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2612
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:09 pm
Re: Turnover ratio through 10 games -- (- 11)
Whoops. I added the INTs and the fumbles lost together. But the point doesn't change.
Also, I think it's fair to point out that after the UTEP game, there was a near consensus that this team was going to have QB problems throughout the season. So what we are seeing really shouldn't surprise us.
I think we got a little excited after the TCU game thinking that McDermott was the answer when that didn't turn out to be the case.
Also, I think it's fair to point out that after the UTEP game, there was a near consensus that this team was going to have QB problems throughout the season. So what we are seeing really shouldn't surprise us.
I think we got a little excited after the TCU game thinking that McDermott was the answer when that didn't turn out to be the case.