Jeff Reinebold WED AM

smupony94 · Post by **smupony94** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:22 pm

Jeff Reinebold
WED AM...FLYING TO HOUSTON THEN HITTING TWO ALL DISTRICT DEFENSIVE PLAYERS WITH MULTIPLE OFFERS WHO ARE STILL IN THE TEXAS STATE PLAYOFFS...6PM GET THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO INTO THE HOME OF A THREE STAR SAFETY WHO TURNED DOWN THE ACC TO COMMIT TO SMU...LONG AND VERY PHYSICAL HE CAN BE A GREAT PLAYER IN COACH MASON'S DEFENSIVE SCHEME BECAUSE HE HAS THAT RARE COMBINATION OF SIZE - SPEED - TOUGHNESS AND INTELLIGENCE..

redpony · Post by **redpony** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:24 pm

Lock 'em up Jeff-o.

GO PONIES!!!

Dutch · Post by **Dutch** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:26 pm

Jeff is a good dude.

smusic 00 · Post by **smusic 00** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:37 pm

Go pinonies!

smubrooks · Post by **smubrooks** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:52 pm

All of the coaches should be required to maintain constant status updates like this so that we know what they are up to at all times. And more importantly who's not pulling their weight!

2ndandlong · Post by **2ndandlong** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:55 pm

Go Mustangs!

The PonyGrad · Post by **The PonyGrad** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 4:09 pm

smubrooks wrote:All of the coaches should be required to maintain constant status updates like this so that we know what they are up to at all times. And more importantly who's not pulling their weight!

Mystery Coach -
I WAS SITTING AROUND THE HOUSE TODAY WATCHING SOAPS AND EATING BON BONS.
:shock:

MustangSTATS · Post by **MustangSTATS** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 4:20 pm

smubrooks wrote:All of the coaches should be required to maintain constant status updates like this so that we know what they are up to at all times. And more importantly who's not pulling their weight!

I can see the next status update: "Missed my flight to snag a key recruit due to trying to keep ponyfans.com updated 24/7, after all they pay my salary... :roll:

"

Mestengo · Post by **Mestengo** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 4:23 pm

The guys that are not recruiting are old and not being paid as much

smupony94 · Post by **smupony94** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 4:34 pm

Jeff Reinebold
WED 2:30...HOW ABOUT THESE NUMBERS...17 SACKS AND 12 SACKS...THOSE ARE THE SACK TOTALS THE OLB AND DE I JUST SAW HAVE AMASSED IN THEIR SENIOR SEASONS...BOTH GUYS HAVE MULTIPLE OFFERS BUT ARE MATURE ENOUGH TO FOCUS ON WINNING A STATE TITLE FIRST BEFORE MAKING A COLLEGE CHOICE...QUALITY PLAYERS AND PEOPLE...PONY UP!

ponyboy · Post by **ponyboy** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 4:40 pm

And EVERY school has a similar arrangement, where some pull more recruiting weight than others. I don't know why Mr dot, dot, dot has his underwear so tied up over this.

PoconoPony · Post by **PoconoPony** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:16 pm

I love to see us after so many talented kids. This weekend has a number of Cali kids on campus and all are talented with a few of them verbals. My question is where do we get the scholarships if 5 or 6 of these kids seek to commit and we are still trolling after some Jucos. Seems like we have a chance to have a huge and significant recruiting class that can turn things around, but I keep reading that we on have room for 2 or maybe 3 more. Where do we stand if this weekend brings some hugh hits?

Stallion · Post by **Stallion** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:52 pm

This is why you rarely hear other Coaches comment on the recruitment of recruitable athletes. Surfer Dude routinely violates the rule by commenting on the "ability" of the recruitable athletes. Everybody that follows recruiting knows exactly who is speaking about 60% of the time Surfer Dude posts this crap.

13.10.2 Comments Before Signing. Before the signing of a prospective student-athlete to a National Letter of Intent or an institution's written offer of admission and/or financial aid, a member institution may comment publicly only to the extent of confirming its recruitment of the prospective student-athlete. The institution may not comment generally about the prospective student-athlete's ability or the contribution that the prospective student-athlete might make to the institution's team; further, the institution is precluded from commenting in any manner as to the likelihood of the prospective student-athlete's signing with that institution. Violations of this bylaw do not affect a prospective student-athlete's eligibility and are considered institutional violations per Constitution 2.8.1. (Revised: 1/14/97)

Gotcha · Post by **Gotcha** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:00 pm

Stallion wrote:This is why you rarely hear other Coaches comment on the recruitment of recruitable athletes. Surfer Dude routinely violates the rule by commenting on the "ability" of the recruitable athletes. Everybody that follows recruiting knows exactly who is speaking about 60% of the time Surfer Dude posts this crap.

13.10.2 Comments Before Signing. Before the signing of a prospective student-athlete to a National Letter of Intent or an institution's written offer of admission and/or financial aid, a member institution may comment publicly only to the extent of confirming its recruitment of the prospective student-athlete. The institution may not comment generally about the prospective student-athlete's ability or the contribution that the prospective student-athlete might make to the institution's team; further, the institution is precluded from commenting in any manner as to the likelihood of the prospective student-athlete's signing with that institution. Violations of this bylaw do not affect a prospective student-athlete's eligibility and are considered institutional violations per Constitution 2.8.1. (Revised: 1/14/97)

Stallion wins again! Hilarious. Go Jeff.

Dutch · Post by **Dutch** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:01 pm

Good point BB