PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

TEXAS=BCS BIRTH

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

TEXAS=BCS BIRTH

Postby Mustangs35SMU » Sun Dec 05, 2004 5:40 pm

Texas is going to the Rose Bowl!

They have moved up over Cal!! :oops:
Image
User avatar
Mustangs35SMU
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 13007
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Garland, TX

Postby BIGHORSE » Sun Dec 05, 2004 8:24 pm

I FIND MORE REASONS TO

HATE THOSE CRIMINALS

EVERYDAY.
User avatar
BIGHORSE
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2881
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:49 pm

Postby NavyCrimson » Sun Dec 05, 2004 8:51 pm

u can bet this will add even more fuel to the ever growing argument for the pac-10 to back out of the bcs-bs cartel...I LOVE IT MORE & MORE!!!!!!!!!:P :P :P :P :P :P

i talked with a big usc supporter last wk & no one that he knows loves the bcs-bs!!!

BURN BABY BURN!!!
BRING BACK THE GLORY DAYS OF SMU FOOTBALL!!!

For some strange reason, one of the few universities that REFUSE to use their school colors: Harvard Crimson & Yale Blue.
User avatar
NavyCrimson
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3163
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Simi Valley-CA (Hm of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library)

Re: TEXAS=BCS BIRTH

Postby Lotus » Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:16 am

Mustangs35SMU wrote:Texas is going to the Rose Bowl! ....

What a complete joke. There's no way to call it anything else.

At least they didn't beg their way into the Orange Bowl. Although considering the money behind UT's program -- and their new status as Notre Dame's equal in the "it's our birthright to be treated better than everyone else" department -- it's hard to believe they didn't get that, too.
User avatar
Lotus
All-American
 
Posts: 831
Joined: Wed Jul 17, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: TEXAS=BCS BIRTH

Postby Diehard Pony » Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:27 am

Mustangs35SMU wrote:Texas is going to the Rose Bowl!

They have moved up over Cal!! :oops:


Mustangs35 I have always appreciated your incredible enthusiasm and support for SMU, but I would venture to say that there is not another single poster on this board who is pleased and / or cares that Texas got a BCS bowl. They lead the charge on the breakup of the SWC, and have publically stated in the past that they would not consider scheduling us again. They also played a very supportive role in the investigation of SMU before the DP was handed down. SMU fans that support Texas in any way would be an extremely rare breed.
User avatar
Diehard Pony
All-American
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas

Postby Corso » Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:32 am

Very well said. Don't lose your enthusiasm, 35 - just keep in mind, as DP says, that you won't find a lot of UT fans around SMU.
User avatar
Corso
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2820
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Richardson, Texas

Postby PK » Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:43 am

I don't think Mustangs35SMU was displaying any enthusiasm for UT only stating how embarassing it is for Cal. The BcS screws each other almost as much as they screw the rest of us.
User avatar
PK
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 8805
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas 75206

Re: TEXAS=BCS BIRTH

Postby Hoss » Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:06 am

Lotus wrote:
Mustangs35SMU wrote:Texas is going to the Rose Bowl! ....

What a complete joke. There's no way to call it anything else.

At least they didn't beg their way into the Orange Bowl. Although considering the money behind UT's program -- and their new status as Notre Dame's equal in the "it's our birthright to be treated better than everyone else" department -- it's hard to believe they didn't get that, too.

Mack's whining and begging for support and attention is almist as disgusting as ESPN's repeated promoting of that stupid earnhart movie they're trying to make us think is interesting. Those commercials every 10 seconds are painful, much like Mack's sniveling. Too bad it worked for him.
User avatar
Hoss
All-American
 
Posts: 656
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma

Postby Stallion » Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:06 am

Texas clearly deserved a BCS bid this year. I can name about 3 teams that didn't but UT definitely did.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Postby LakeHighlandsPony » Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:53 am

Lets get this straight- When a mediocre Southern Miss team takes you to the 4th quarter then you will drop in the rankings. Aaron Rodgers sounded like he was living in denial yesterday. He should worry about Tech and Saddam Leach hanging 70 on them.
User avatar
LakeHighlandsPony
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2558
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:50 am
Location: The Boneyard

Re:

Postby Mustangs35SMU » Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:59 am

PK wrote:I don't think Mustangs35SMU was displaying any enthusiasm for UT only stating how embarassing it is for Cal. The BcS screws each other almost as much as they screw the rest of us.


Exactly

I hate Texas. Just another scam in the BCS

Maybe I should've put :evil: instead of :oops:
Image
User avatar
Mustangs35SMU
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 13007
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Garland, TX

Postby LA_Mustang » Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:23 am

I hate the Horns as much as anyone, but they did deserve a BCS bowl game. There’s no doubt they’re one of the six best teams in the country. IMHO, here are the top six teams:

USC, OU, Auburn, UT, Cal, Utah

Add the winners of the Big Ten (Michigan) and the ACC (Virginia Tech) and have a playoff. Decide it on the field. In three weeks you would have a true champion.

#1 USC vs #8 VT
#2 OU vs #7 Michigan
#3 Auburn vs #6 Utah
#4 UT vs #5 Cal
User avatar
LA_Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 15604
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 4:01 am
Location: El Porto, CA 90266

Postby ponyte » Mon Dec 06, 2004 10:45 am

It is just the nature of the bias. The BCS has a huge bias for the Big 12. The Big 12 receives preferential treatment over other conferences. How else could one explain OU’s appearance in the National championship game after getting blown out by KSU. And how could one explain Nebraska’s appearance in the National Championship game after getting creamed by Colorado a few years back. And which teams were left out to make way for Big 12? One year Oregon and the next time it is USC. Both Pac 10 teams and both deserved to play. But the BCS is not about rewarding teams for excellence. The BCS is about money for the cartel members and some members are more equal than others.

Also, why in the world is Pitt in the BCS?
User avatar
ponyte
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11209
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Nw Orleans, LA region

Postby EastStang » Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:01 am

Lucky for UT that Cal didn't drop lower, or Boise might have slipped in at #6 and gotten a second auto bid for a non-BCS team. That would have been very just deserts for our friends in Austin.
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12660
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Postby Water Pony » Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:34 am

This is worst case for the Rose Bowl that no Pac 10 team gets to go. Cal was deserving as much as Texas and has the tradition.

Rose Bowl will want to get out of BCS arrangement, if they can't get their PAC 10 or Big Ten preference.
User avatar
Water Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5512
Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Chicagoland


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests

 
cron