Did mid-level get smeared with Utah-Pitt match-up?

by **SWC2010** » Sun Dec 05, 2004 5:40 pm

How does Utah 'represent' the mid-tier when BCS won't give them any respect. If I were the Utes, I'd rather get my [deleted] whipped by CAL than playing PITT...

Let's hear from you

by **EastStang** » Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:54 am

Personally I would have preferred a UT-Utah matchup. But, UTAH can be Pitt. If they do it might bode well for future mid-majors to get invites.

by **Water Pony** » Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 am

I agree that the Ute's deserved a higher ranked opponent. The problem is the automatic bid for the Big East. Cal should have gone to the Rose Bowl and, as much as I don't like them, Texas to Fiesta to oppose Utah.

by **mrydel** » Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:35 pm

I bet that $17 million spends just as well regardless of who Utah plays. The game at this stage is secondary. They will not get the #1 ranking so just enjoy the bucks. I think the BEST game will still be Louisville/Boise.

by **gostangs** » Mon Dec 06, 2004 12:49 pm

caught part of a Lousivlle game a while back - could not get over the resemblence of that RB somebody Bush? to Eric Dickerson - runs like him exactly, and even has the same number. I know he is not our favorite these days - but I will enjoy wathcing this game and rembering when.......

Did mid-level get smeared with Utah-Pitt match-up?

Did mid-level get smeared with Utah-Pitt match-up?

Who is online