How the hell are we behind Marshall in CUSA? It makes no sense. We have more 3 star recruits than them and more overall recruits...
How much stock do you put in those rankings? Just curious as well.
|
Rivals rankings?Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Rivals rankings?How the hell are we behind Marshall in CUSA? It makes no sense. We have more 3 star recruits than them and more overall recruits...
How much stock do you put in those rankings? Just curious as well. Pony Up!
Re: Rivals rankings?Here is what someone posted a while back on how it is done:
The position rankings are key in the Rival's formula. Rice got the #5 kicker so their "N" in the formula below was 18 (versus 0 for SMU since none of the SMU commits who were position ranked were ranked high enough to generate any "N" points). So basically because Rice got a "top" kicker, their rivals points were multiplied by a bigger factor. Here is the team ranking formula for those interested... (please keep in mind a statistician from UC-Berkeley developed this for us). Please note you only take the top 20 prospects in this formula, ordered by # Stars descending. POINTS = ((N / (N + 50)) * H) + ((50 / (N + 50)) * L) where... H = 250 for each 5-star commit + 140 for each 4-star + 75 for each 3-star + 20 for each 2-star + 10 for each 1-star L = 18 for each 5-star + 12 for each 4-star + 8 for each 3-star + 3 for each 2-star + 1 for each 1-star N = a big honkin' calculation, described below CALCULATION OF N: 10 for each commit on the Rivals 100 (high school) ranked 1-10 9 for each commit on the Rivals 100 (high school) ranked 11-20 etc. down to... 1 for each commit on the Rivals 100 (high school) ranked 91-100 10 for each commit on the Rivals 100 (non-high school) ranked 1-10 9 for each commit on the Rivals 100 (non-high school) ranked 11-20 etc. down to... 6 for each commit on the Rivals 100 (non-high school) ranked 41-50 24 for each commit ranked #1 on his official position ranking 18 for each commit ranked #2-5 on his official position ranking 8 for each commit ranked 6-X on his official position ranking, where X is dependent on detail position, as listed below... --Dual-threat QB: 25 --Pro-style QB: 25 --Running Back: 35 --All-Purpose Back: 15 --Fullback: 15 --Wide Receiver: 50 --Tight End: 20 --Offensive Tackle: 40 --Offensive Guard: 30 --Offensive Center: 10 --Defensive Tackle: 50 --Weakside Defensive End: 20 --Strongside Defensive End: 30 --Inside Linebacker: 35 --Outside Linebacker: 35 --Cornerback: 40 --Safety: 30 --Athlete: 25 --Kicker: (no points awarded for rank lower than 5th) If the team's average stars are greater than 3, add (100 * (Avg stars - > 3)) to N. Last edited by SMU 86 on Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown
________________________Champion________________________ ![]()
Re: Rivals rankings?I thought maybe it was alphabetical.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: Rivals rankings?SMU 86--Now can you please explain quarterback ratings? And that string theory thing? And women? And where socks go? Thanks!
Re: Rivals rankings?
Lots of luck on that one. ![]() SMU's first president, Robert S. Hyer, selected Harvard Crimson and Yale Blue as SMU's colors to symbolize SMU's high academic standards. We are one of the few Universities to have school colors with real meaning...and we just blow them off.
Re: Rivals rankings?
How many points do I get on the math section if I just sign my name?
Re: Rivals rankings?We moved ahead of Marshall. Our classes aren't comparable. I don't know how they were ahead of us.
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests |
|