lwjr wrote:Junior wrote:lwjr was just passing along infornation as he found it for those too lazy to go find out anything about the story on their own. don't shoot the messenger. he's not an investigative reporter, nor has he claimed to ever be one. if you have evidence that it is not 60-82 players, please pass this along. and please include a link.
Thank you, Junior. Not sure how I could have been anymore clear.
Not sure where you get the laziness thing. I had seen the affidavits saying that already. When lwjr said it, I got the impression it might have been more official, which is why I asked for a link.
Lwjr, since you asked: you could have been more clear if you had said that the FWST reported that an accused drug dealer/player told his client/under cover cop that 82 players had failed the test. Basically, the title of this thread is a good example - it gives the primary source of the statement (T. Brock) which is more relevant than which media outlet is passing it along.
The way you worded could have given the impression that the FWST reported that 82 players failed, when in fact they were just reporting what the drug dealer/player said.
Not trying to pick a fight, just explaining why I was looking for clarification and responding to your follow up.