Patterson will drug test TCU players after spring break

Pony^ · Post by **Pony^** » Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:14 pm

So be good on spring break, Horned Frogs, because you'll have to pee in a cup to prove you were, and remember, big brother Patterson is always watching.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr- ... 08615.html

DiamondM75 · Post by **DiamondM75** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:51 am

There will be a pop quiz on Friday. SURPRISE!!!

SMUer · Post by **SMUer** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:20 am

Why? I thought, other than the four dealers, only one player tested positive. Isn't it a national epidemic? Isn't TCU miles better than other schools? Probably because they lost to us last year and didn't want his players toking this Spring while we are busy preparing for our Super Bowl.

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:37 am

Way to announce the drug test to the players ahead of time.

If any one of them tests positive, they should be kicked out of school for stupidity.

Junior · Post by **Junior** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:09 am

Fatterson already admitted it was between 5 and 82. Everyone knows it wasn't 5, but it wasn't 82. The 5 was a story leaked by a TCU sympathiser. It was no more accurate than the 82 the Tanner Brock spouted out.

I find it funny that all the TCU fans seem to think that since 5 was the last number someone mentioned in the media that it must be the correct number. If it was the correct number, the unnamed source would have been named.

redpony · Post by **redpony** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:23 am

CalallenStang wrote:
If any one of them tests positive, they should be kicked out of school for stupidity.

Isn't stupidity the reason they went to froggie high instead of a real academic institution?

mrydel · Post by **mrydel** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:54 am

I hope the SMU kids are listening and not just laughing. I would almost bet a test for our guys also.

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:38 pm

Junior wrote:Fatterson already admitted it was between 5 and 82. Everyone knows it wasn't 5, but it wasn't 82. The 5 was a story leaked by a TCU sympathiser. It was no more accurate than the 82 the Tanner Brock spouted out.

I find it funny that all the TCU fans seem to think that since 5 was the last number someone mentioned in the media that it must be the correct number. If it was the correct number, the unnamed source would have been named.

Actually, [Gary Patterson] said "maybe it's 5, maybe it's 82." So he didn't rule 82 out.

And I think it was one of the other players that said 82, not Brock.

Junior · Post by **Junior** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:56 pm

CalallenStang wrote:
Junior wrote:Fatterson already admitted it was between 5 and 82. Everyone knows it wasn't 5, but it wasn't 82. The 5 was a story leaked by a TCU sympathiser. It was no more accurate than the 82 the Tanner Brock spouted out.

I find it funny that all the TCU fans seem to think that since 5 was the last number someone mentioned in the media that it must be the correct number. If it was the correct number, the unnamed source would have been named.

Actually, [Gary Patterson] said "maybe it's 5, maybe it's 82." So he didn't rule 82 out.

And I think it was one of the other players that said 82, not Brock.

You're probably right. But I bet Brock thought it....

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:58 pm

Junior wrote:
CalallenStang wrote:
Junior wrote:Fatterson already admitted it was between 5 and 82. Everyone knows it wasn't 5, but it wasn't 82. The 5 was a story leaked by a TCU sympathiser. It was no more accurate than the 82 the Tanner Brock spouted out.

I find it funny that all the TCU fans seem to think that since 5 was the last number someone mentioned in the media that it must be the correct number. If it was the correct number, the unnamed source would have been named.

Actually, [Gary Patterson] said "maybe it's 5, maybe it's 82." So he didn't rule 82 out.

And I think it was one of the other players that said 82, not Brock.

You're probably right. But I bet Brock thought it....

Yeah, I think Brock's comment was something like he was certain that at least 75% of the team failed the test

EastStang · Post by **EastStang** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:03 pm

If a Frog pees in the cup will anyone notice?

Bergermeister · Post by **Bergermeister** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:40 pm

EastStang wrote:If a Frog pees in the cup will anyone notice?

When I was a kid out catching frogs, I always noticed when a frog peed on my hand.

SMU89 · Post by **SMU89** » Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:14 pm

The Police will be looking for speeders on mockingbird next week