BigT3x wrote:The TCU sting involved a variety of drugs.
The "variety of drugs" was charged to only two people among the 17 initially arrested. One of them wasn't a TCU student. For the other 15, the charge was marijuana in misdemeanor amounts. In a few cases, the FWPD lured the sale into a drug-free zone to automatically juice up the charge from misdemeanor to felony.
College students using and selling small amounts of MJ... what a news flash.
Oh, woe is TCU. The whole world is against them...
BigT3x wrote:The TCU sting involved a variety of drugs.
The "variety of drugs" was charged to only two people among the 17 initially arrested. One of them wasn't a TCU student. For the other 15, the charge was marijuana in misdemeanor amounts. In a few cases, the FWPD lured the sale into a drug-free zone to automatically juice up the charge from misdemeanor to felony.
College students using and selling small amounts of MJ... what a news flash.
Oh, woe is TCU. The whole world is against them...
He just addressed the guys statement with a proper correction. Seems like you have a problem with the truth being laid out. But let's take your case on anyway since that is what you want to talk about. Let us know when was the last time there was a 6 month drug investigation on a college football team? if your argument has merit, there should be plenty of recent examples. Just list them all for us that have happened in the last 10 years.
just as in this case, any such results would never be made public due to privacy concerns. you're kidding yourself if you think there were only 5 or 6 positive pops on the drug test Fatterson gave the team.
i'm not denying that there are probably people on every football team in the country that smoke a little weed every now and then. i don't have a problem with that.
i do have a problem wiith people defending TCU in any capacity on any issue.
