PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
Dubbya
Junior Varsity
Junior Varsity
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Austin/Washington, D.C. (OK, Dallas)

PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by Dubbya »

What a pile of crap.

Several analysts have said this list of sanctions against State Penn "could be worse than the Death Penalty." Seriously?

We had no games for two years.
We fielded a team of kids who got the crap beaten out of them, even though they were (are) the toughest group of players ever assembled.
They'll still have TV games, I think.

They're still going to have football. They're still going to have tailgating, when fans can get together in support of their team. I think they're still going to be on TV. And just watch: after studying what the DP did here, the NCAA will help prop up State Penn in a few years to "help it return to a competitive level."

Kudos to Kirk Herbstreit for being the only analyst I have seen so far who has the spine to point out that today's sanctions are NOT as severe as the Death Penalty. It's not even close.
Last edited by Dubbya on Mon Jul 23, 2012 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Dubbya
Junior Varsity
Junior Varsity
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Austin/Washington, D.C. (OK, Dallas)

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by Dubbya »

And Lou Holtz says "I can not think of a more devastating decision by the NCAA."

REALLY?

Senile dope.
User avatar
leopold
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4112
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by leopold »

The only possible group this could end up being more devastating for is the buisinesses around campus that rely on football revenue to make money - that group may end up suffering.

Outside of that, this is NOWHERE near the Death Penalty.
User avatar
HB Pony Dad
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3950
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:35 pm
Location: Huntington Beach, California

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by HB Pony Dad »

Penn State vs. USC Penalties

Penn State

Four-year postseason ban
$60 million fine, to go to an endowment for children's charities
10 incoming scholarships lost first year, 20 scholarship deduction for four years (more or less an entire roster worth of scholarships)
Vacation of all wins from 1998 through 2011 (meaning Joe Paterno now ranks seventh among all D1 coaches in wins)
Five years probation
Penn State players can transfer immediately without penalty

Additionally, from the Big Ten,

Loss of about $13 million in Big Ten bowl money, also to children's charities.
Four-year bowl ban and Big Ten Championship Game ban


USC

Two year postseason ban for the Trojans, compared to four years for the Nittany Lions.
30 scholarships lost for the Trojans over three years compared to 40 scholarships lost for Penn State.
A national championship vacated for USC, as well as Pac-10 championships from 2004 and 2005. Penn State has lost all their victories from 1998 to 2011, and their Big Ten championships from 2005 and 2008).
Four years of probation for USC combined to five years of probation for Penn State.


In both situations, players under probation periods could transfer immediately. It might be harder to expect Penn State players to stick around compared to USC players, and you have to imagine the recruiting restrictions are going to hurt.

It's still extremely bizarre that we have to even compare either of these situations. It's bizarre that the latter is considered the second most egregious punishment of a major college football power. While the fault was in the cover-up for USC, should the punishment have been that drastic for the Trojans in retrospect? Should the NCAA even be getting involved in punishing current student-athletes and just focus their attention on the vacating of wins?

Who knows. One thing that will never seem to end is the NCAA back-patting, and that requires some gag reflexing. At least the money is going to the right places.
SMU - IT'S YOUR TURN

FIRE JUNE JONES

Image
USC Trojan for Life and SMU Dad!
SC Pony
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 4:49 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by SC Pony »

Lou Holtz = Senile bought moron
User avatar
giacfsp
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1852
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by giacfsp »

leopold wrote:The only possible group this could end up being more devastating for is the buisinesses around campus that rely on football revenue to make money - that group may end up suffering.

Outside of that, this is NOWHERE near the Death Penalty.

Hadn't thought of that. VERY good point.

When SMU re-started football, Coach Gregg said he thought it might be "about five years" before we were competitive again, and that didn't really happen until the last three years. This Penn State stuff won't have anywhere near the crippling effect the DP did.
User avatar
ponyfanman
Junior Varsity
Junior Varsity
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:58 pm
Location: Lindale, TX

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by ponyfanman »

No where near it. It's ironic everytime they say it's worse than the DP and turn around say it will only be 10 yrs until they are competitive again. Apparently they haven't been watching SMU football for a few decades.
"Why should I hire you to be my latex salesman?" JS
User avatar
ponyte
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11216
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
Contact:

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by ponyte »

They have home and away games and the wins/
losses count. No games means no games, no wins/losses no nothing!

They still get to play on TV.

They will not have to sub soccer for Homecoming.

They will still have sports articles, recruiting and rivals to play.

Sorry but the DP isn’t even close to these sanctions.
User avatar
PK
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 8805
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas 75206

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by PK »

We might as well get use to the fact that we were the first, last and forever the only football program to get the DP. An unfortunate distinction, but on the other hand, "SMU" will come up nationally over and over again forever. 8)
SMU's first president, Robert S. Hyer, selected Harvard Crimson and Yale Blue as SMU's colors to symbolize SMU's high academic standards. We are one of the few Universities to have school colors with real meaning...and we just blow them off.
bubba pony
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1560
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 3:01 am

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by bubba pony »

I hate Penn State and wouldn't be upset if they got more. BUT I was afraid the NCAA would do nothing but a slap on the wrist. At least they did something. Let's hope some of their recruits and current players leave.

If my memory serves me correctly, when SMU got the penalty, all the football players left except 1 or 2. Of course there were no games for 2 years so an easier decision if you were a player.
SMU made restrictions on ourselves for 25 years. Penn State won't do that
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12690
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by EastStang »

TV made it impossible to give them the death penalty. The Big Ten Network would have lost a huge chunk of revenue if PSU (and the State of Pennsylvania) left the Big Ten. They crippled them, but did not kill them. Its not worse than the death penalty, but its pretty bad. Reducing scholarships, 4 year bowl ban means this year's players (except redshirts) will never be able to play in a bowl which means that a kid going to Utah State has a better chance to go to a bowl than a player at Penn State.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by Hoop Fan »

not only TV, it would have been a scheduling nightmare in the Big 10 given the division setup. would have meant unbalanced divisions and the NCAA would have had to have granted the Big10 a waiver to even hold a champ game since need 12 teams by rule. DP was never gonna happen for PSU. And just like USC is back to preseason #1 already, PSU will be top 15 team within 5 years. They will start recruiting well again two years from now because those recruits will look at the future and only face missing bowl games in their redshirt (who cares) and freshman years. 5 years from now, PSU will be a powerhouse again.

The NCAA also did PSU a favor by not dragging out a long investigation. Uncertainty is worse than anything, this way, PSUs healing process starts today unlike in many situations where there is months if not years of NCAA clouds hanging over a program before the shoe drops.
User avatar
Special_Delivery_Smu_Fans
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas-Texas-USA
Contact:

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by Special_Delivery_Smu_Fans »

Although Penn State can not play in bowl games, will they still get their regular share of Big Ten bowl game revenue sharing?
"THE SMU BLVD - - NO PLACE ELSE" (retired)
User avatar
PonyPlayer4
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2557
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:47 pm
Location: Dallas, Tx

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by PonyPlayer4 »

No bowl game revenue either, which is expected to be another $13 million hit.
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: PSU sanctions "worse than Death Penalty"

Post by Rebel10 »

Special_Delivery_Smu_Fans wrote:Although Penn State can not play in bowl games, will they still get their regular share of Big Ten bowl game revenue sharing?


Didn't the Big 10 just rule that they would not get their share?
#HammerDown
Post Reply