Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
LakeHighlandsPony
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2558
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:50 am
Location: The Boneyard

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by LakeHighlandsPony »

Boy, the world has sure lowered the bar. "it's only one failed drug test"?! 30 years ago 1 failed drug test and you were out of school much less the team. Maybe if they had zero tolerance of drugs that would stop some of it. What's next " I only beat my wife once"
Last edited by LakeHighlandsPony on Sun Aug 05, 2012 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 32038
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by mrydel »

I do not know that anyone here is agreeing with the policy, just stating what the policy is. When I was in school it was a 5 year jail term just for possession of any amount of pot. I did not agree with that either but it was the law at the time and if for applied to one you expected it for all even though that was not the case.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
User avatar
whitwiki
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1497
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:22 pm

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by whitwiki »

LakeHighlandsPony wrote:Boy, the world has sure lowered the limbo bar. "it's only one failed drug test"?! 30 years ago 1 failed drug test and you were out of school much less the team. Maybe if they had zero tolerance of drugs that would stop some of it. What's next " I only beat my wife once"

donta stall worth only killed one person while driving drunk.
User avatar
Arkpony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6468
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Little Rock, AR USA

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by Arkpony »

When I was art SMU, Candy Barr received ( I recall) over 20 years in the pen for mere possession of pot. Times have indeed changed, but it's still illegal.
Long live Inez Perez!
User avatar
Glenn Sosbee
All-American
All-American
Posts: 529
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:21 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by Glenn Sosbee »

Junior wrote:Ooohh! I get it now.

As long as everyone else is doing it, we should just let it go. Linda like everyone overlooked the fact that everyone was paying players in the 80's.
Best post ever.
Pony P-1
ReedFrawg
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1936
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Fort Worth, TX, US

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by ReedFrawg »

Junior wrote:Ooohh! I get it now.

As long as everyone else is doing it, we should just let it go. Linda like everyone overlooked the fact that everyone was paying players in the 80's.


It's the new reality...would be shocked if at least one smu player hasn't tested positive. It happens everywhere and no, that does not make it right.
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by Rebel10 »

Paschel will not be suspended because he went to counseling.

One failed drug test, by TCU standards, means, according to the TCU Student Handbook, section 3.2.10 Drugs, "a. failing a non-incident motivated drug screen one time will result in mandatory drug education counseling and/or required drug treatment."

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/08/03 ... rylink=cpy
#HammerDown
User avatar
LakeHighlandsPony
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2558
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:50 am
Location: The Boneyard

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by LakeHighlandsPony »

So if your an incoming freshman then drugs are OK because you are given one "freebie".
User avatar
FroggieFever
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Highland Park

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by FroggieFever »

LakeHighlandsPony wrote:So if your an incoming freshman then drugs are OK because you are given one "freebie".


TCU has some of the strictest drug polices in Division 1. There are no "freebies."
Go Frogs! Pony Up!
ponyboy
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 15134
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: University Park,TX US

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by ponyboy »

Uh huh.
I’m coming home
I’m coming home
Tell the World I’m coming home
User avatar
malonish
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:42 am
Location: Nope

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by malonish »

Rebel10 wrote:Paschel will not be suspended because he went to counseling.

One failed drug test, by TCU standards, means, according to the TCU Student Handbook, section 3.2.10 Drugs, "a. failing a non-incident motivated drug screen one time will result in mandatory drug education counseling and/or required drug treatment."

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/08/03 ... rylink=cpy



That's for a non incident. Wasn't the whole drug bust considered an incident? If that's not an incident then what is? What's the ruling on an incident motivated drug screen? If the screen was not related to the bust then let me know.
Leader of the Band-itos.

Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!

PonyPride:
I think malonish is right

peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

Image
User avatar
malonish
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:42 am
Location: Nope

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by malonish »

FroggieFever wrote:
LakeHighlandsPony wrote:So if your an incoming freshman then drugs are OK because you are given one "freebie".


TCU has some of the strictest drug polices in Division 1. There are no "freebies."



Nice post. Now start providing links to help us out. Don't you know how the internet works?
Leader of the Band-itos.

Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!

PonyPride:
I think malonish is right

peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

Image
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by CalallenStang »

malonish wrote:
Rebel10 wrote:Paschel will not be suspended because he went to counseling.

One failed drug test, by TCU standards, means, according to the TCU Student Handbook, section 3.2.10 Drugs, "a. failing a non-incident motivated drug screen one time will result in mandatory drug education counseling and/or required drug treatment."

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/08/03 ... rylink=cpy



That's for a non incident. Wasn't the whole drug bust considered an incident? If that's not an incident then what is? What's the ruling on an incident motivated drug screen? If the screen was not related to the bust then let me know.


I thought that the drug screen in question occurred before the drug bust. Could be wrong, though.
User avatar
FroggieFever
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Highland Park

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by FroggieFever »

malonish wrote:
FroggieFever wrote:
LakeHighlandsPony wrote:So if your an incoming freshman then drugs are OK because you are given one "freebie".


TCU has some of the strictest drug polices in Division 1. There are no "freebies."



Nice post. Now start providing links to help us out. Don't you know how the internet works?


It was posted here a two months ago, I will try and find it.
Go Frogs! Pony Up!
User avatar
FroggieFever
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1301
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Highland Park

Re: Patterson will not suspend Pachall. What a surprise

Post by FroggieFever »

FroggieFever wrote:It was posted here a two months ago, I will try and find it.



http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootbal ... g-policies

Schools of note:
TCU: (1) none; (2) "may include at least" one-year suspension; (3) dismissal.
UCLA: (1) none; (2) none; (3) one game; (4) dismissal.
Illinois: (1) none; (2) 1/12th of regular-season games; (3) 1/4th of regular season games; (4) one year.
Penn State: (1) none; (2) seven days; (3) one year; (4) dismissal.
Texas: (1) none; (2) "if suspended, length of suspension determined by athletic director;" (3) dismissal.
Texas A&M: (1) none; (2) "possible suspension;" (3) possible dismissal.
Go Frogs! Pony Up!
Post Reply