Rick Hart

ponyscott · Post by **ponyscott** » Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:10 pm

Just e-mail both Hart and Turner at the same time....they will get the message. I sent to both this AM and have sent one after the TAMU debacle....just keep hammering them with your concerns. It doesn't take long and it couldn't hurt and it may help get us change here at SMU before we get embarrassed in the BE, so just do it...

SMU_Alumni11 · Post by **SMU_Alumni11** » Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:03 am

ponyscott wrote:Just e-mail both Hart and Turner at the same time....they will get the message. I sent to both this AM and have sent one after the TAMU debacle....just keep hammering them with your concerns. It doesn't take long and it couldn't hurt and it may help get us change here at SMU before we get embarrassed in the BE, so just do it...

What's turners email??

ponyscott · Post by **ponyscott** » Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:04 pm

SMU_Alumni11 wrote:
ponyscott wrote:Just e-mail both Hart and Turner at the same time....they will get the message. I sent to both this AM and have sent one after the TAMU debacle....just keep hammering them with your concerns. It doesn't take long and it couldn't hurt and it may help get us change here at SMU before we get embarrassed in the BE, so just do it...

What's turners email??

'Turner, Gerald' <[email protected]>

SMU_Alumni11 · Post by **SMU_Alumni11** » Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:10 pm

ponyscott wrote:
SMU_Alumni11 wrote:
ponyscott wrote:Just e-mail both Hart and Turner at the same time....they will get the message. I sent to both this AM and have sent one after the TAMU debacle....just keep hammering them with your concerns. It doesn't take long and it couldn't hurt and it may help get us change here at SMU before we get embarrassed in the BE, so just do it...

What's turners email??

'Turner, Gerald' <[email protected]>

Thank you, any responses?

ponyscott · Post by **ponyscott** » Sun Sep 23, 2012 2:21 pm

What's turners email??[/quote]

'Turner, Gerald' <[email protected]>[/quote]

Thank you, any responses?[/quote]

Just form responses, but the more they get they have to take heed...... :shock:

Bergermeister · Post by **Bergermeister** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:29 am

I sent 2 emails in full support of June Jones and our staff. Got a response on both - evidently not "form letters" since they were totally different in regard to composition. We've got 9 more chances to win 5 more games. Pony Up!

SMU 86 · Post by **SMU 86** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:44 am

Bergermeister wrote:I sent 2 emails in full support of June Jones and our staff. Got a response on both - evidently not "form letters" since they were totally different in regard to composition. We've got 9 more chances to win 5 more games. Pony Up!

So now we have lowered the bar to a 6 win season as being successful in a year that CUSA is weaker than ever in Coach Jones' 5th year with all the Bennett players gone? Come on guys we should be aiming at a CUSA title as success. Let's do it.

78pony · Post by **78pony** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:45 am

Nice job berger. Let's continue to shoot for mediocrity and 6+/- wins.

SMUer · Post by **SMUer** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:51 am

SMU IS...content with mid-tier mediocrity...as long as it gets us to one of the 34+ bowl games.

Oliver · Post by **Oliver** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:03 am

Bergermeister wrote:I sent 2 emails in full support of June Jones and our staff. Got a response on both - evidently not "form letters" since they were totally different in regard to composition. We've got 9 more chances to win 5 more games. Pony Up!

If these are your true sentiments, and your goal is make another average bowl with 6 or 7 wins in a mid to low level conference, you should probably change your profile signature to something other than "expect the unexpected"

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:06 am

Bergermeister wrote:I sent 2 emails in full support of June Jones and our staff. Got a response on both - evidently not "form letters" since they were totally different in regard to composition. We've got 9 more chances to win 5 more games. Pony Up!

If 6 wins is now the goal, JJ has to go!!! We need a Gary Patterson here at SMU!!

couch 'em · Post by **couch 'em** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:44 am

Might as well drop to Div-1AA if our year 5 standard for success is beating up on our really really weak conference and not even competing against teams that people care about.

ponyscott · Post by **ponyscott** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 11:51 am

Bergermeister wrote:I sent 2 emails in full support of June Jones and our staff. Got a response on both - evidently not "form letters" since they were totally different in regard to composition. We've got 9 more chances to win 5 more games. Pony Up!

We all love underachievers like you and June.

squire · Post by **squire** » Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:48 pm

PonySnob wrote:
Bergermeister wrote:I sent 2 emails in full support of June Jones and our staff. Got a response on both - evidently not "form letters" since they were totally different in regard to composition. We've got 9 more chances to win 5 more games. Pony Up!

If 6 wins is now the goal, JJ has to go!!! We need a Gary Patterson here at SMU!!

Would Patterson come here for 4 mil?

PonySnob · Post by **PonySnob** » Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:27 am

squire wrote:
PonySnob wrote:
Bergermeister wrote:I sent 2 emails in full support of June Jones and our staff. Got a response on both - evidently not "form letters" since they were totally different in regard to composition. We've got 9 more chances to win 5 more games. Pony Up!

If 6 wins is now the goal, JJ has to go!!! We need a Gary Patterson here at SMU!!

Would Patterson come here for 4 mil?

I'm not saying we need Gary Patterson, but we need a coach that brings his kind of intensity and who clearly knows how to motivate and get his team prepared to play......and wins! JJ doesn't know anything about success on the field like Patterson does............

Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart

Re: Rick Hart