Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 29068
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by Charleston Pony »

RGV Pony wrote:Hey, we are the only ones allowed to take shots at our fanbase.

FWIW the two loudest moments I've experienced at Ford were Taylor Thompson's sack of uteps qb in 09 and sterling's int to start the 2nd half v tcu in 2010



The loudest I've ever heard Ford was the goal line stand late in the Kansas game that opened Ford Stadium
PonyKai
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:04 am
Location: Here and there.

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by PonyKai »

Beat their asses like stepchildren and then he looks like a dipsh*t for running his mouth. That simple. Win the damn game tomorrow, you know, like we're supposed to be doing...winning games.
Cougar King

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by Cougar King »

skurtn wrote:Speaking of no home field advantages. How's UH this year?



That's funny considering that we're 0-3 yet have still sold out our games and 40k tickets have been sold for the game against Rice at Reliant tomorrow. Anyway, if the O from the La Tech game and the D from the UCLA game show up, we'll blow out Rice similar to Case's 9 TD pass performance last year.
BCSteam
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:03 pm

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by BCSteam »

gostangs wrote:all that stuff is a season long campaign - its not just for TCU. If TCU had a business school worth a crap they could figure that out.


That's funny. Business Week has TCU's at 28 and SMU at 30 in that nation. So, what's your logic?
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 32038
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by mrydel »

GiddyUp wrote:Not directed at the great PonyFans. We just don't get loud, simple enough.

As RGV said, loudest moment I remember was the sack by Thompson against UTEP. The place went nuts.

However, I do hope Davis pounds him in the turf very hard. He is a doucher.

I rank this just after the missed FG by OU on the last play of the Astro Bluebonnet Bowl in '68. Best sound I have heard n Ford.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
skurtn
All-American
All-American
Posts: 592
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:40 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by skurtn »

Well, it's pretty easy to understand why SMU's record is what it is.
You know, recovering from death penalty, more universities to contend with, smaller school, etc.
What's UH's excuse? Certainly isn't the education requirements...
User avatar
SMUer
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5276
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas, The United States of America

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by SMUer »

Garry Patterson is such a [Garry Patterson]. This thought that all SMU does from January to October is game-plan for TCU has got to be the lamest excuse for a team not showing up as expected I've ever heard. Get over yourself, Garry. You Frogs that ape GP and think this is an insult sound just as lame.
User avatar
Frog Barrister
Junior Varsity
Junior Varsity
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:06 pm

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by Frog Barrister »

BCSteam wrote:
gostangs wrote:all that stuff is a season long campaign - its not just for TCU. If TCU had a business school worth a crap they could figure that out.


That's funny. Business Week has TCU's at 28 and SMU at 30 in that nation. So, what's your logic?



Shut up. SMU has a law school. It makes their undergrads smarter than you. If you don't stop, one of their frat boys will rape you, but only if you're a dude.
User avatar
Frog Barrister
Junior Varsity
Junior Varsity
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:06 pm

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by Frog Barrister »

Cougar King wrote:
skurtn wrote:Speaking of no home field advantages. How's UH this year?



That's funny considering that we're 0-3 yet have still sold out our games and 40k tickets have been sold for the game against Rice at Reliant tomorrow. Anyway, if the O from the La Tech game and the D from the UCLA game show up, we'll blow out Rice similar to Case's 9 TD pass performance last year.


But SMU has a way sweeter brick color. That's what really matters in football.
User avatar
malonish
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:42 am
Location: Nope

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by malonish »

We have better fountains too. I hear they're planning to add 6 more in the next 5 years.
Leader of the Band-itos.

Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!

PonyPride:
I think malonish is right

peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

Image
User avatar
malonish
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:42 am
Location: Nope

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by malonish »

Cougar King wrote:It's not like he's lying. Plus it's spelled Pachall. (Pronounced Paw-hall)


I pronounce it Pot-hall.
Leader of the Band-itos.

Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!

PonyPride:
I think malonish is right

peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

Image
User avatar
Mustangs_Maroons
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:03 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by Mustangs_Maroons »

BCSteam wrote:
gostangs wrote:all that stuff is a season long campaign - its not just for TCU. If TCU had a business school worth a crap they could figure that out.


That's funny. Business Week has TCU's at 28 and SMU at 30 in that nation. So, what's your logic?


Logic is this is the first time ever this has happened and in every other ranking (US News for undergrad and MBA) and Business week for MBA programs, we're miles ahead. The real question is where is your logic? NM.
Last edited by Mustangs_Maroons on Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mustangs_Maroons
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:03 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by Mustangs_Maroons »

Frog Barrister wrote:
BCSteam wrote:
gostangs wrote:all that stuff is a season long campaign - its not just for TCU. If TCU had a business school worth a crap they could figure that out.


That's funny. Business Week has TCU's at 28 and SMU at 30 in that nation. So, what's your logic?



Shut up. SMU has a law school. It makes their undergrads smarter than you. If you don't stop, one of their frat boys will rape you, but only if you're a dude.


Law school is for graduate students. Next.
User avatar
Mustangs_Maroons
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2076
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:03 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by Mustangs_Maroons »

Frog Barrister wrote:
Cougar King wrote:
skurtn wrote:Speaking of no home field advantages. How's UH this year?



That's funny considering that we're 0-3 yet have still sold out our games and 40k tickets have been sold for the game against Rice at Reliant tomorrow. Anyway, if the O from the La Tech game and the D from the UCLA game show up, we'll blow out Rice similar to Case's 9 TD pass performance last year.


But SMU has a way sweeter brick color. That's what really matters in football.


We have a better campus. There's no disputing that. You have a better football team but that's all you have. So don't get into academic debates. So, let's stick to football since this is a football thread.
Last edited by Mustangs_Maroons on Fri Sep 28, 2012 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cougar King

Re: Paschall: SMU Has No Home Field advantage

Post by Cougar King »

skurtn wrote:Well, it's pretty easy to understand why SMU's record is what it is.
You know, recovering from death penalty, more universities to contend with, smaller school, etc.
What's UH's excuse? Certainly isn't the education requirements...


New players filling in for a lot of seniors at the skill positions we had last year, just broke in our 5-star receiver, something your team wouldn't know anything about. You should worry about the frogs coming in your house tomorrow. We'll invade Ford in a few weeks from now, so hold your horses.
Post Reply